Teams

SKrenz (Pine Lake)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-05vs APatrocino/CWaldrop (LifeTime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Allison Moseley vs Michele Sutherland / Daniela Pagano4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-28vs SGrindle (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Tracy Graham vs Cyndie Hobson / Cameron Hobson4-6, 0-6
2023-09-14vs JBlack (Matthews)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Lydia Schoeck vs Leila Tissue / Diane Brown1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-09-11vs NHaskins/KBrewer (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Graham / Allison Moseley vs Rachel Sawyer / Sophie Graham7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-31vs DCastain (Col Beatty)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Marianne Keaton vs Dawn Castain / Fe Read6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Moseley / Connie Daniel vs Kristine Predmore / Amy Wiethoff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Lydia Schoeck vs Lori Andersen / Jane Lee6-2, 6-4
2023-08-17vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarianne Keaton / Allison Moseley vs Kristin Heidkamp / Janet Gilliam7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs STo (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesArliss Day / Lydia Schoeck vs Jenni Beasley / Trudy Thailer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Graham / Allison Moseley vs Eryn Ratcliffe / Alyce Lofgren0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Marianne Keaton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Sarah Krenz
published
3.40
Robin Boyles
published
3.35
Tracy Graham
published
3.19
Connie Daniel
published 3.5
3.19
Allison Moseley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Ashle Basden
published 3.5
Gretchen Pfeiffer
published
Kathleen Ramsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianne Keaton + Lydia Schoeck311659% games+4.3% vs expected
Allison Moseley + Lydia Schoeck13656% games+3.0% vs expected
Marianne Keaton + Allison Moseley5359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Marianne Keaton
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
Sarah Krenz
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Robin Boyles
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Tracy Graham
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Connie Daniel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Allison Moseley
52W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ashle Basden
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Gretchen Pfeiffer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Ramsey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.