Teams

NHH: Fireballs: Gershfeld

2026 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-11vs EBT:40-Love Summer:BandakLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Marie Crane vs Kim Bandak / Heather Dever7-5, 5-5
L#1 SinglesHeather Bradley vs Ali Cordova2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaudelle Natividad Le / Linda Sadinsky vs Caitlin Goos / Jennifer StephenTorpey2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Marlow / Lillian Garcia vs Melinda Grice / Kristen Bradley1-6, 5-7
2026-06-28vs GF:Après Aces:Longhini/BowerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Marie Crane vs Brisa Tamborlane / Kristen Mercuri5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLiz van Leer vs Holly Wheeler2-3
W#2 DoublesClaudelle Natividad Le / Carol Evans vs Rebecca Bower / Francesca Allegra6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-21vs TRC:Smash Girls:Sizer/FlynnSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSheila Cimmino / Marie Crane vs Cara Kilgallen / Gillian Sizer3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLiz van Leer vs Mary Matera6-4, 3-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Linda Sadinsky vs Susan Tibbetts / Priscilla Twombly6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeather Bradley / Carol Hazen vs Loretta Bohnen / Mary Lou Ramery6-3, 6-3
2026-06-18vs EBT:40-Love Summer:BandakSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLiz van Leer / Jeanne Stracener vs Pamela Boushie / Deidra Picciano6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHeather Bradley vs Christina Morgan5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJunjira Sookvaree / Susan Griffiths vs Kim Bandak / Laurie Walls3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSandra Kennedy / Peg Oliveira vs Mary Gunzy / Jennifer StephenTorpey3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-13vs MRC: Love All: KimLost 12
W#1 DoublesLiz van Leer / Susan Griffiths vs Mina Kim / Juliana Foster3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandra Kennedy vs Ana Murray1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSheila Cimmino / Lillian Garcia vs Tina Rivera / Silvia Islam4-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs MRC: Love All: KimLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusan Griffiths / Jeanne Stracener vs Jennifer Avari / Mina Kim6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Bradley vs Ana Murray1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Evans / Judith Marlow vs Maggie Chan Jones / Leigh Libero3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJunjira Sookvaree / Linda Sadinsky vs Silvia Islam / Dana Manning1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-16vs GF:Après Aces:Longhini/BowerLost 04
L#1 DoublesSheila Cimmino / Liz van Leer vs Averi Cappetta / Amelia Chivetta4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Bradley vs Kristen Mercuri1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJunjira Sookvaree / Svetlana Gershfeld vs Allison Armstrong / Brisa Tamborlane1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Hazen / Lillian Garcia vs Wendy Chicosky / Debbie Kelly5-7, 4-4
2026-05-02vs TRC:Smash Girls:Sizer/FlynnWon 31
L#1 DoublesJeanne Stracener / Liz van Leer vs Gillian Sizer / Kim Flynn3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesHeather Bradley vs Dale Norton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSheila Cimmino / K Metcalfe vs Lorraine Oldale / Sloan Jamali3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPeg Oliveira / Claudelle Natividad Le vs Loretta Bohnen / Diana Jackson6-2, 6-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Liz van Leer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.34
Jeanne Stracener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Susan Griffiths
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Sheila Cimmino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Marie Crane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Junjira Sookvaree
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Claudelle Natividad Le
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Peg Oliveira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Heather Bradley
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
2.99
Judith Marlow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Carol Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Lillian Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Sandra Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Linda Sadinsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Svetlana Gershfeld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Carol Hazen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
K Metcalfe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Griffiths + Liz van Leer8456% games+11.3% vs expected
Susan Griffiths + Marie Crane13459% games+8.3% vs expected
Sheila Cimmino + Liz van Leer16953% games+5.2% vs expected
Sandra Kennedy + Peg Oliveira7357% games+4.8% vs expected
Claudelle Natividad Le + Svetlana Gershfeld3348% games+4.2% vs expected
Liz van Leer + Jeanne Stracener6257% games+4.2% vs expected
Svetlana Gershfeld + Sandra Kennedy9652% games+3.6% vs expected
Sheila Cimmino + Claudelle Natividad Le5161% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz van Leer
72W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Jeanne Stracener
49W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Susan Griffiths
98W–88L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Sheila Cimmino
53W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Marie Crane
30W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Junjira Sookvaree
94W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Claudelle Natividad Le
57W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Peg Oliveira
41W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Heather Bradley
23W–18L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Judith Marlow
35W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Carol Evans
55W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Lillian Garcia
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Sandra Kennedy
44W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Linda Sadinsky
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Svetlana Gershfeld
63W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
3
Carol Hazen
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
K Metcalfe
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.