Teams

Carter - Pinehurst # 9

2024 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.5 Senior Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-28vs Kitrell - CCNCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Toni Davenport vs Courtney McGuirt / Michele Keel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey vs Victoria Adkins / Elizabeth Webster6-3, 6-4
2024-04-14vs Nixon - Lawn and TennisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Cassie Drexel vs Mary Bonsall / Michelle Benson7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Carter / Carolyn Voltz vs Ann Tucker / Del Metcalf4-6, 3-6
2024-03-24vs Bryan - Highland Country ClubLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Andrea Ale vs Pia Thompson / Sandra Jones4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEileen Carter / Carolyn Voltz vs Marion Bryan / Kim Hasty6-7, 2-6
2024-03-10vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Eileen Carter vs Mary Howard / Kathy Maas6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs Nixon - Lawn and TennisWon 20
W#1 DoublesToni Davenport / Theresa Roach vs Ann Tucker / Del Metcalf4-5
W#2 DoublesEileen Carter / Carolyn Voltz vs Lisa Nixon / Mary Bonsall6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-18vs Bryan - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Cassie Drexel vs Pia Thompson / Sandra Jones3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey vs Kim Hasty / Harriett Shooter4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Theresa Roach
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.26
Eileen Carter
published
3.25
Carolyn Voltz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.04
Megan Mercer
published
2.97
Kate Humphrey
published
Carol Gemson
published 3
Deborah Masotti
published 3
Andrea Ale
published
Maya Callaghan
published
Toni Davenport
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Mercer + Eileen Carter5157% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Voltz + Theresa Roach2348% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Voltz + Eileen Carter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Theresa Roach
91W–82L career · 11 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.49
Eileen Carter
21W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carolyn Voltz
70W–107L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Megan Mercer
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.04
Kate Humphrey
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Carol Gemson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Deborah Masotti
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Andrea Ale
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maya Callaghan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Toni Davenport
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.