Teams

STC Schroeder

2025 OH OV SUMMER Combo · 8.5 Combo Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-10vs QRRC KlankSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Grant / Jonathan Westfall vs Matt Critchfield / Asher Monson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyan Paul / Nathan Kleptz vs Samuel Songer / Dylan Donaldson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-22vs QRRC KlankWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Grant / Stephen Coates vs Karl Monson / Noah Monson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Paul / Nathan Kleptz vs SCOTT WELDE / Asher Monson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Dunker / Richard Miller vs Samuel Songer / Daniel Songer1-6, 2-6
2025-05-25vs QRRC KlankLost 02
L#1 DoublesNathan Lucas / Stephen Coates vs Matt Critchfield / Jonathan Peters2-5
L#2 DoublesRichard Miller / Christopher Kalweit vs Conrad Klank / Robert Lair6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Grant
published 4.5
4.17
Zach Clendenen
published
4.17
Philip Brumbaugh
published
3.89
Dominic Marino
published 4.5
3.88
Christopher Kalweit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Nathan Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Stephen Coates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Craig Gibson
published 4
3.75
Nathan Kleptz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Jonathan Westfall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Austin Justice
published
Jeffrey Dunker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominic Marino + Nathan Lucas6172% games+15.0% vs expected
Dominic Marino + Jeffrey Dunker8553% games+2.6% vs expected
Jonathan Westfall + Nathan Lucas431957% games+0.1% vs expected
Jonathan Westfall + Nathan Kleptz5258% gamesnot enough data
Jonathan Westfall + Dominic Marino2446% gamesnot enough data
Dominic Marino + Stephen Coates224 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Dunker + Stephen Coates314 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Lucas + Stephen Coates044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Grant
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zach Clendenen
34W–38L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Philip Brumbaugh
15W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Dominic Marino
26W–31L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.89
4
Christopher Kalweit
38W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.88
Nathan Lucas
74W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Stephen Coates
72W–68L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Craig Gibson
34W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Kleptz
16W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Jonathan Westfall
134W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Austin Justice
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Dunker
45W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.