Teams

GEPTA/40&overMX/9.0/Cantrell/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gustavo Ganem
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Angela Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Chris Missirian
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 4.5
4.09
Carlos Fraire
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.01
Claudia Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.70
Cathey Jo Alberson
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 4
Judy Harlas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Leila Lobato
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 35% · published
Michael Kotowski
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Paula Prado
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Sophia Adamson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Timothy Cantrell
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Herrera + Paula Prado7941% games−1.8% vs expected
Leila Lobato + Claudia Calderon3548% gamesnot enough data
Angela Herrera + Claudia Calderon3350% gamesnot enough data
Paula Prado + Claudia Calderon1543% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Fraire + Timothy Cantrell2449% gamesnot enough data
Carlos Fraire + Chris Missirian0636% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Angela Herrera123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gustavo Ganem
18W–17L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Angela Herrera
60W–52L career · 20 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
4.5
Chris Missirian
49W–66L career · 23 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Carlos Fraire
40W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Claudia Calderon
41W–57L career · 28 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Cathey Jo Alberson
45W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.70
Judy Harlas
30W–29L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leila Lobato
65W–61L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Gonzalez Friedl
83W–110L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Kotowski
130W–48L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophia Adamson
36W–18L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Cantrell
43W–59L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.