Teams

San Jose - Wise

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-10vs Duval/Johnson/40&Over3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesKim Price / Amanda Blocker vs Jessica Downs / Sue Newman1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKarin Selfors vs Karlie Goodman1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Brannon / Dawn Siebenhaar vs Jen Bates / Judibelle Roman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatharine Healey / Michelle Kalil vs Angela Johnson / Kendall Taylor6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesCarmel Buchanan / Catherine Decunto vs Jennifer Osbeck / Eden Payton7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Natasha Eliz
published
3.50
Julie Boone
published
3.46
Karin Selfors
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Dawn Siebenhaar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Michelle Kalil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Amanda Blocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Janet Olinto
published
3.20
Amy Rice
published 3.5
3.19
BETSEY WINSLOW
published 3.5
3.17
Anna Valent
published 3.5
3.17
Allison Wise
published 3.5
3.16
Carmel Buchanan
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Emily Dostie
published 3.5
3.11
Catherine Decunto
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Katharine Healey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Brannon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Olinto + Allison Wise224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Kalil + Karin Selfors213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasha Eliz
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.53
Julie Boone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
Karin Selfors
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Dawn Siebenhaar
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Michelle Kalil
11W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amanda Blocker
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Korman Shelton
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Olinto
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amy Rice
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
BETSEY WINSLOW
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Anna Valent
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Allison Wise
11W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Carmel Buchanan
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Emily Dostie
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Catherine Decunto
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.11
Katharine Healey
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Brannon
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.