Teams

SD 3.5 Balboa TC (3:2)/ George

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD - Men - 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-21vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ ReyesWon 41
W#1 DoublesChad Alligood / George Benakos vs Daniel Frink / Michael Seelinger6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs Lennard Ordinario2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Massaro / Michael Sparaco vs Marco Bonillas / Shaun Dawson6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKent Seiders vs Rafael Salinas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJer Hernandez / Jay Palma vs Robert Flores / Mustafa Rasheed6-2, 6-2
2026-06-07vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ KamasLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatt George / Edgar Vigil vs Matt Bone / Jeffrey Newton1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJeremy Zacks vs Eric Vaca2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBradley Parker / Jerome van Amburg vs Dee Domingo / Jeremy HACKWORTH0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew James White vs Daniel Gebremedhin0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Sparaco / Daniel Lara vs Austen Mcrae / Christopher Happ6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs SD 3.5 LJB&TC (5@2PM)/ McGowanWon 32
W#1 DoublesMatt George / George Benakos vs Michael McGowan / Adam Hoch4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew James White vs Oliver Kearney0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJay Palma / Michael Sparaco vs James Chatfield / Mark Willoughby6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs Billy Shaw7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJerome van Amburg / Chad Alligood vs Shervin Badamchi / Daniel Ryan6-3, 6-4
2026-05-24vs SD 3.5 UCRC (3:2 11AM)/ ChinLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatt George / Daniel Lara vs Melvin Pascoguin / Bryan Yung6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeremy Zacks vs Kevin Hew2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJames Phirman / Anthony Demavivas vs Tyler Van Stone / Keith Chin4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBradley Parker vs Amir Naghshineh-Pour1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJay Palma / Chad Alligood vs David Livingston / Chris Anthes7-5, 6-2
2026-05-17vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ WursterWon 32
L#1 DoublesMichael Sparaco / Daniel Lara vs Matt Whitmire / Thomas Spillane3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs Benjamin Bergen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Michael Massaro vs John Wurster / Scott Trulove6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAndrew James White vs John Masterson6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJerome van Amburg / Bradley Parker vs Richard Schwab / Sujantra Mckeever6-0, 7-5
2026-05-09vs SD LLW 3.5 Balboa TC/ AgraLost 05
L#1 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Matt George vs Joel Corrales / Soon Chye Ho1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew James White vs Gil Squire1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Lara / Michael Sparaco vs Cody Heitzman / Samnang Rim2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs Romain Delaville3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJer Hernandez / Anthony Demavivas vs Thien Nguyen / Zachary Hayes3-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMatt George / Michael Sparaco vs Alex Trejo / Sami Sweis4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs James Doan2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Andrew James White vs Michael Desmarais / Michael Speck7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJeremy Zacks vs William Pelham2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJerome van Amburg / James Phirman vs Spondee Shenn / Eduardo Ilano6-3, 6-2
2026-04-26vs SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ RussellLost 05
L#1 DoublesGeorge Benakos / Daniel Lara vs Paul Rybak / Brian Cox6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEdgar Vigil vs Russell Austin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatt George / James Phirman vs Sergio Gamiz / Jenner Smith3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMichael Massaro vs Jeffrey Russell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Parker / Anthony Demavivas vs Ramiro Muzquiz / Michael Faltico2-6, 1-6
2026-04-19vs SD 3.5 PTC (5@1PM)/ Nguyen- HaireLost 23
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lara / Kent Seiders vs Kevin Dudley / Carl Wiese6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGeorge Benakos vs Tyler Haire6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Massaro / Edgar Vigil vs George Annobil / James Capurro7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJeremy Zacks vs Tyler LaMont6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJer Hernandez / Jay Palma vs Richard Moulton / Chase Tashjian1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · SD - Men - 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD LLW 3.5 Balboa TC/ Agra81291639367
2SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ Kamas72281742344
3SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Russell63321332304
4SD 3.5 Slamajamas @BTC (3:2)/ Chaiwimol63271840347
5SD 3.5 LJB&TC (5@2PM)/ McGowan63271841351
6SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ Reyes45212456435
7SD 3.5 UCRC (3:2 11AM)/ Chin36192658419
8SD 3.5 Balboa TC (3:2)/ George36172859429
9SD 3.5 PTC (5@1PM)/ Nguyen- Haire27172861447
10SD 3.5 SDTRC (3:2)/ Wurster0983776501

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Chad Alligood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Edgar Vigil
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.33
George Benakos
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Daniel Lara
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Jay Palma
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Michael Massaro
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.22
Jerome van Amburg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Andrew James White
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Matt George
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.16
Michael Sparaco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Jeremy Zacks
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.15
James Phirman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Anthony Demavivas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.01
Jer Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Bradley Parker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Kent Seiders
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Palma + Jer Hernandez213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Lara + Michael Sparaco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chad Alligood
74W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Edgar Vigil
2W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
George Benakos
5W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Daniel Lara
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Jay Palma
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Michael Massaro
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Jerome van Amburg
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrew James White
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Matt George
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Michael Sparaco
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Jeremy Zacks
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
James Phirman
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Anthony Demavivas
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.05
Jer Hernandez
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Bradley Parker
2W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Kent Seiders
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.