Teams

TYCC/Dreisbach

2026 Hillsborough TriLevel 18 & Over · 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs Apollo Beach/BryanWon 20
W#2 DoublesMorgan Lenz / Jana Bridge vs Rene Kenyon / Mary Alice Hillier0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Ann Dellegatto / Amanda Rockwood vs Evonski Lennear / Mary Flynn7-5, 6-0
2026-08-18vs Apollo Beach/BryanLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Shoukry / Aspen Kahl vs Kristie Bryan / Sonia Patrick1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Lenz / Beth Thompson vs Rene Kenyon / Arielle Flynn6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Rockwood / Mary Ann Dellegatto vs Mary Flynn / Atsuko Gentz2-6, 3-6
2026-08-16vs HCC TRI-AGAIN/BarkettLost 12
L#1 DoublesAspen Kahl / Amy Shoukry vs Angie Jones / McKenzie O'Brien6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Drukteinis / Kristine Chunn vs Jennifer Price / Kristen Wehrman7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCasey Saylor / Coley Simmons vs Kiernan O'Keefe / Amanda Kluber0-6, 4-6
2026-08-14vs HCC TRI-AGAIN/BarkettLost 12
L#1 DoublesKendall Shumake / Andria Owen vs Skyler Boynton / McKenzie O'Brien6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMorgan Lenz / Beth Thompson vs Rebecca Evangelista / Monica Barkett6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Dreisbach / Megan Vinson vs Neisa Dokken / Amanda Kluber3-6, 4-6
2026-07-12vs Apollo Beach/BryanWon 21
W#1 DoublesAspen Kahl / Kendall Shumake vs Julie Martin / Arielle Flynn6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMorgan Lenz / Leanne Brown vs Mary Alice Hillier / Debra Bell3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Dreisbach / Megan Vinson vs Evonski Lennear / Deborah Bianchi6-2, 6-2
2026-06-28vs HCC TRI-AGAIN/BarkettLost 03
L#1 DoublesAspen Kahl / Meredith Mueller vs Angie Jones / Stephanie Means2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMorgan Lenz / Kristine Chunn vs Christina Dausch / Monica Barkett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCasey Saylor / Katie Johnson vs Brittney Herron / Vicki McGill0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HCC TRI-AGAIN/Barkett5011412123
2Apollo Beach/Bryan135714108
3TYCC/Dreisbach1451020143

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kendall Shumake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Andria Owen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Jennifer Drukteinis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Meredith Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Aspen Kahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Beth Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Morgan Lenz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Kristine Chunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Leanne Brown
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.61
Jana Bridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Amanda Rockwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Dreisbach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Casey Saylor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Megan Vinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Coley Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Mary Ann Dellegatto
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Dreisbach + Megan Vinson4260% games+24.2% vs expected
Mary Ann Dellegatto + Amanda Rockwood5457% games−0.9% vs expected
Mary Ann Dellegatto + Lisa Dreisbach2347% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Drukteinis + Aspen Kahl314 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Mueller + Aspen Kahl213 matchesnot enough data
Andria Owen + Kendall Shumake213 matchesnot enough data
Beth Thompson + Morgan Lenz213 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Rockwood + Lisa Dreisbach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendall Shumake
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Andria Owen
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
4.26
4
Jennifer Drukteinis
74W–25L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
Meredith Mueller
65W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
50%50%<1%
4.00
4.5
Aspen Kahl
111W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94
4
Beth Thompson
12W–8L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Morgan Lenz
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Kristine Chunn
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
Leanne Brown
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Jana Bridge
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Amanda Rockwood
103W–73L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Lisa Dreisbach
93W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Casey Saylor
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Megan Vinson
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Coley Simmons
64W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Mary Ann Dellegatto
68W–108L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.