Teams

Wallace - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-15vs Tan - SHLWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Cherie Krohn / William Krohn6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / George Rials vs Shannon Schluter / Clay Anderson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-02-08vs Escambia/Tran/40&Over7.0XDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / George Rials vs Tara McCarthy / Brian Masterson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-30vs McElhany - PCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Michael Yager / Denise Prindiville3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGeorge Rials / Jacqueline Wallace vs Thuy Nguyen / Ryan Tilley6-1, 7-6
2023-01-18vs Escambia/Tran/40&Over7.0XDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Wallace / George Rials vs Ashle Tran / Robert Cruise6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2023-01-11vs Whittenberger - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / Jeannette Fabbro vs Michael Ghiorso / Amanda Brown5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Carl Miller / Julie Sowell6-3, 6-3
2023-01-04vs Bonsignore - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Mecy Wimberly vs Emily Hillman / Craig Abel6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kirk Bradley
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Creagh Ekelund
published 3.5
3.25
Mecy Wimberly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Kenneth Wallace
published
3.21
Jeannette Fabbro
published
3.18
Jacqueline Wallace
published
3.15
Troy Gill
published
John Wimberly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mecy Wimberly + John Wimberly202250% games−15.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirk Bradley
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Creagh Ekelund
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mecy Wimberly
96W–91L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Kenneth Wallace
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Jeannette Fabbro
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jacqueline Wallace
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.18
Troy Gill
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.15
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.