Teams

Farrington/Yan

2026 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-15vs Johnson/SebringLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Poulsen / Layne Kortbein vs Melonie Sebring / Lisa Proepper6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKatie Wright vs Taylor Rondo3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Farrington / Ann Fort vs Cathleen Maloney / Lori Carling2-6, 0-6
2025-12-08vs Stromberg/Haynes 3.5 ES26Lost 14
L#1 DoublesHannah Bossert / Layne Kortbein vs Joan Cahill / Tram Struve3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShauna Yang vs Sharia Carlson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYelena Yan / Georgia Ulmer vs Kalei Cartwright / Kiana Schuchard6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDunja Sher vs Gina Collins7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLaura Farrington / Ann Fort vs Amy Holter / Meredith Stromberg2-6, 1-6
2025-12-01vs Landrus 18+ ES26Lost 23
L#1 DoublesKatie Wright / Layne Kortbein vs Jean Larson / Jennifer Christie0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAurel Agbemaple vs Madeline Roess0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Farrington / Ann Fort vs Christine Wellner / Jane Newman1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMengyuan Wang vs Ella White6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLanette Wedell / Georgia Ulmer vs Heather Landrus / Lynn Hu6-3, 6-1
2025-11-17vs Miller / Gordon - 18+ 3.5Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Wright / Sarah Poulsen vs Amy Weber / Sanni Wurst6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Amy Gustafson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Bossert / Lanette Wedell vs Stephanie Sislo / Laura Olson1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLayne Kortbein vs Hilary Lunke1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Farrington / Ann Fort vs Mollie Ritter / Biz McShane7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-10vs Ehle/Henke 18+ ESLost 13
L#1 DoublesYelena Yan / Dunja Sher vs Renee Marek / Kara McGuire1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Poulsen vs LT Nguyen7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeorgia Ulmer / Lanette Wedell vs Laurie Ehle / Heidi Johnson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShauna Yang vs Jennifer Frascone1-6, 2-6
2025-11-03vs Johnson/SebringLost 14
L#1 DoublesKatie Wright / Aurel Agbemaple vs Kavitha Bharath / Melonie Sebring0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Poulsen vs Lori Carling6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMengyuan Wang / Shauna Yang vs Joyce Rosenbery / Diana Smigielski0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHannah Bossert vs Cathleen Maloney0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLanette Wedell / Georgia Ulmer vs Kate Segler / Ellen Anderson2-6, 4-6
2025-10-27vs Stromberg/Haynes 3.5 ES26Lost 23
L#1 DoublesLayne Kortbein / Katie Wright vs Joan Cahill / Anna Havelka1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesSarah Poulsen vs Sharia Carlson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDunja Sher / Yelena Yan vs Kiana Schuchard / Tram Struve2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHannah Bossert vs Gina Collins6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMengyuan Wang / Shauna Yang vs KJ Madison / Meredith Stromberg1-6, 0-6
2025-10-20vs Landrus 18+ ES26Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSarah Poulsen / Layne Kortbein vs Keela Cottew / Madeline Roess2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Ella White1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShauna Yang / Mengyuan Wang vs Lynn Hu / Nancy Grubbs4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAurel Agbemaple vs Lauren Kubal0-6, 4-6
2025-10-13vs Miller / Gordon - 18+ 3.5Lost 14
L#1 DoublesHannah Bossert / Sarah Poulsen vs Jane Hill / Maria Loucks5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Wright vs Biz McShane6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Farrington / Ann Fort vs Laura Olson / Mollie Ritter3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShauna Yang vs Hilary Lunke3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMengyuan Wang / Lanette Wedell vs Heather Klein / Amy Weber3-6, 2-6
2025-10-06vs Ehle/Henke 18+ ESLost 04
L#1 DoublesShauna Yang / Katie Wright vs Clodagh McAfee / Stephanie Dean0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLayne Kortbein vs Jennifer Frascone2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Fort / Laura Farrington vs Kara McGuire / Renee Marek2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesYelena Yan / Lanette Wedell vs Mary Henke / Marcie Myers2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller / Gordon - 18+ 3.591371334358
2Ehle/Henke 18+ ES91341635326
3Get A Grip - Borthwick/Warren82361434383
4Allex Monday Madness ES2682361436386
5Ostlund: PERfect In Pink ES2682311950415
6Hultman/Jopke 3.5 ES 202646252555453
7Curfman/Wernet - ES 3.5 18+46222863455
8Stromberg/Haynes 3.5 ES2646232764477
9Landrus 18+ ES2637193166461
10Overdahl ES2628163475520
11Weinberg: The Netizens19123881546
12Farrington/Yan010104084551

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Sarah Poulsen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.08
Dunja Sher
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Hannah Bossert
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Layne Kortbein
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.05
Mengyuan Wang
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.00
Katie Wright
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.87
Shauna Yang
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.80
Laura Farrington
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.78
Yelena Yan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Lanette Wedell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Aurel Agbemaple
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.75
Ann Fort
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Georgia Ulmer
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Farrington + Ann Fort113040% games+1.7% vs expected
Yelena Yan + Dunja Sher3448% games−0.4% vs expected
Hannah Bossert + Layne Kortbein3443% games−8.3% vs expected
Georgia Ulmer + Yelena Yan134 matchesnot enough data
Katie Wright + Layne Kortbein033 matchesnot enough data
Georgia Ulmer + Lanette Wedell123 matchesnot enough data
Mengyuan Wang + Shauna Yang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Poulsen
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Hannah Bossert
6W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Layne Kortbein
10W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Mengyuan Wang
21W–9L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Katie Wright
7W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Shauna Yang
8W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Laura Farrington
11W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Lanette Wedell
18W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
3.5
Aurel Agbemaple
0W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
3
Ann Fort
11W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Georgia Ulmer
17W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.