Teams

Latiolais/18/2.5/Combo/BEVR

2025 LAF Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-07vs Guidry/18/2.5/Combo/OCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Hebert / Stephanie Latiolais vs Kimberly Fontenot / Lenisse Robertson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPriscilla Spain / Brianna Walker vs Kristin Fooshee / Jessica Fussell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGeralyn Wood / Karen Poirier vs Kaitlynn Caputo / Leah Wagar2-6, 0-6
2025-09-25vs Broussard/18/2.5/Combo/RedsWon 21
L#1 DoublesBridget Defelice / Geralyn Wood vs Jessica Champagne / Denise Dugas0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Latiolais / Ashley Hebert vs Heather Bergeron / Kendall Broussard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Poirier / Brianna Walker vs Toni Castille / Sonya Jumonville6-4, 6-1
2025-09-10vs Massel/18/2.5/Combo/BSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Spain / Brianna Walker vs Schalacey Hayes / Alexandra Shaw4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeralyn Wood / Stephanie Latiolais vs Cori Fontenot / Danielle Reggio3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Hebert / Karen Poirier vs Amanda Boyer / Ashleigh Landry7-6, 6-0
2025-09-07vs Dade/18/2.5/Combo/YSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPriscilla Spain / Brianna Walker vs Lindsey Chitwood / Regine Dade6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Poirier / Bridget Defelice vs Anya Robin / Lacey Carrigee1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShannon Hargrave / Stephanie Latiolais vs Catherine Chauvin / Katy Coffelt6-4, 6-3
2025-08-27vs Doyle/18/2.5/Combo/BEVRWon 30
W#1 DoublesShannon Hargrave / Stephanie Latiolais vs Lyndley McNabb / Courtney Credeur6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Poirier / Geralyn Wood vs Lauren Richard / Sara Broussard6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPriscilla Spain / Bridget Defelice vs Susan Carloss / Angela Doyle6-3, 6-2
2025-08-20vs Girlinghouse/18/2.5/Combo/BEVRWon 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Hargrave / Priscilla Spain vs Lacie Schexnayder / Emily Girlinghouse4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Latiolais / Bridget Defelice vs Daphne Olivier / Reece Foreman3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrianna Walker / Karen Poirier vs Jesse Cayce / Nina Harris6-3, 7-5
2025-08-13vs Dupre/18/2.5/Combo/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesBridget Defelice / Karen Poirier vs Sheryl Russo / ERIN MONICA2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Latiolais / Brianna Walker vs Logan Dupre / Elizabeth Miller4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPriscilla Spain / Geralyn Wood vs Mary McCullough / Renee Berard3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 Laf (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Guidry/18/2.5/Combo/OCC7017410127
2Dupre/18/2.5/Combo/BEVR611925102
3Latiolais/18/2.5/Combo/BEVR5212922188
4Dade/18/2.5/Combo/YSC4313819158
5Broussard/18/2.5/Combo/Reds3481328185
6Girlinghouse/18/2.5/Combo/BEVR2551632198
7Massel/18/2.5/Combo/BSC1681328185
8Doyle/18/2.5/Combo/BEVR0721938235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Priscilla Spain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.54
Brianna Walker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Stephanie Latiolais
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Geralyn Wood
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Ashley Hebert
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
2.02
Bridget Defelice
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.99
Karen Poirier
usually #3 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Shannon Hargrave
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hebert + Bridget Defelice1534% games−3.8% vs expected
Ashley Hebert + Karen Poirier224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Latiolais + Ashley Hebert213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Latiolais + Bridget Defelice123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Latiolais + Shannon Hargrave303 matchesnot enough data
Bridget Defelice + Karen Poirier033 matchesnot enough data
Brianna Walker + Karen Poirier303 matchesnot enough data
Brianna Walker + Priscilla Spain303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Priscilla Spain
38W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.67
3
Brianna Walker
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Stephanie Latiolais
17W–18L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Geralyn Wood
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Hebert
9W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Bridget Defelice
4W–23L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Karen Poirier
7W–17L career · 13 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Shannon Hargrave
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.