Teams

Williams/Knoxville

2026 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-16vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesBrooke Williams / Julia Slagle vs Jasmine Dabbs / Lindsey Stimets3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnnie Adams vs Deanna Unger2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandi Wilson / Lisa Gangelhoff vs Brooke Browning / Santana Ewers2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Sara Wallingford6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lea / Kristi Leach vs Tara Hurley / Leigh Henderson2-6, 1-6
2026-05-02vs King/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristi Leach / Julie Harano vs Allison King / Catalina Knutson1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesElena Burns vs Jennifer McVeigh4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulia Slagle / Annie Adams vs Morgan Cupp / Abigail Osborne6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Williams / Victoria Sissom vs Kim Ewing / Kristin Monge6-4, 6-1
2026-04-18vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lea / Annie Adams vs Jennifer Bell / Danielle Kwasnik1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Georgia Rae Rainer5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole White / Sandi Wilson vs Lisa Huffman / Paola Martinez6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesVictoria Sissom vs Isabel Cunningham7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Simpson / Julia Slagle vs Patsy Fischer / Jill Hoschette6-1, 6-2
2026-04-11vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrooke Williams / Nazo Burgy vs Lindsey Stimets / Lisa Perkey3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Sara Wallingford4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTammy Simpson / Julia Slagle vs Jasmine Dabbs / Deanna Unger7-5, 7-6
L#2 SinglesJenna Sweet vs Lexie Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Gangelhoff / Kristi Leach vs Christina Kaak / Santana Ewers3-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs King/KnoxvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTammy Simpson / Julia Slagle vs Alexa Hooten / Tracy Collins6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesElena Burns vs Lori DeRoos6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrooke Williams / Nazo Burgy vs Laura Spurgin / Abigail Osborne6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Harano / Kristi Leach vs Emily Elison / Kristin Monge4-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesAngela Strange / Sandi Wilson vs Jennifer Bell / Danielle Kwasnik6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Heinrich vs Gabriella Rimmer6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Williams / Victoria Sissom vs Megan Haselschwerdt / Jill Hoschette6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesElena Burns vs Georgia Rae Rainer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNicole White / Annie Adams vs Lisa Huffman / Tammy Shrivalle6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Angela Strange
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Nazo Burgy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Julia Slagle
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.81
Victoria Sissom
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.65
Sandi Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Lauren Heinrich
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Annie Adams
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Tammy Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Elena Burns
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.42
Kristi Leach
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Julie Harano
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.07
Jennifer Lea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jenna Sweet
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Strange + Julia Slagle4554% games+2.6% vs expected
Elena Burns + Jennifer Lea5447% games+0.4% vs expected
Angela Strange + Sandi Wilson213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Slagle + Tammy Simpson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Strange
56W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Nazo Burgy
116W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.89
Julia Slagle
27W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Victoria Sissom
18W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Sandi Wilson
33W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Lauren Heinrich
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Annie Adams
6W–16L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Tammy Simpson
36W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Elena Burns
21W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
Kristi Leach
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Julie Harano
49W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Jennifer Lea
23W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Jenna Sweet
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.