Teams

Jamison/Severn/Nashville

2026 Adult 55 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-02vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Jamison / Laura Newport vs Annette Crocker / Mary Smith7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Goodwyn / Patricia Evans vs Cindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson6-4, 6-2
2026-04-29vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Severn / Laura Newport vs Annette Crocker / Mary Smith2-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Jamison / Ida Johnson vs Mary Ball / MARY SANDERS6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarmen Greenberg / Patricia Evans vs Dawn Simpson / Sherry Crews7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-04-25vs Bailey/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarmen Greenberg / Susan Severn vs Annette Crocker / Beth Stromatt2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Goodwyn / Patricia Evans vs Cindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson6-4, 6-4
2026-04-01vs Bailey/NashvilleSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Evans / Frances Hogue vs Annette Crocker / Sherry Crews0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Roth / Ida Johnson vs Mary Ball / Beth Stromatt6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Jamison / Ida Johnson vs Cindy Cunningham / Mary Smith7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarcy Jacobs / Carmen Greenberg vs Angela Brandon / MARY SANDERS6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Evans / Wendy Roth vs Beth Stromatt / Nancy Bailey1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-21vs Bailey/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesFrances Hogue / Beth Binkley vs Annette Crocker / MARY SANDERS6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Newport / Susan Severn vs Cindy Cunningham / Dawn Simpson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Goodwyn / Kathleen Urban vs Nancy Bailey / Angela Brandon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jamison/Severn/Nashville4214413132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Linda Goodwyn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Laura Newport
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Wendy Roth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Carol Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Beth Binkley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kathleen Urban
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Ida Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Patricia Evans
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Carmen Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Susan Severn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Frances Hogue
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcy Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Jamison + Laura Newport314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Goodwyn
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Laura Newport
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Wendy Roth
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carol Jamison
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Beth Binkley
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Urban
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Ida Johnson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Patricia Evans
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Carmen Greenberg
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Susan Severn
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.54
Frances Hogue
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marcy Jacobs
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.