Teams

Lagoon-Harris-4.0-40-Spring

2023 Spring USTA 40 & Over Night League - Montgomery · 4.0 Men Night

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Albert Smith
published 4
3.63
Keith Wilson
published
3.51
Dean Dunlavy
published 4
3.35
Sukno Park
published
Olivier Dury
published
Rodney Harris
published
Ronald Brown
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Smith
21W–30L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Keith Wilson
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Dean Dunlavy
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Sukno Park
7W–31L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
Olivier Dury
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rodney Harris
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ronald Brown
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.