Teams

RW: Sullivan

2022 RI Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women Flight 1

10 players · average NTRP / RHODE ISLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-16vs HOF: ZizzaLost 03
L#1 DoublesTamara Gorski / Michele Stern vs Erika Aldazabal / Diana Dow3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Neri / Eszter Chase vs Brooke Richter / Karen Camp1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulia Joncas / Kathy Block vs Kristen Ayers / Sally Doire5-7, 5-6
2022-08-11vs HOF: ZizzaLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Stern / Josie Richmond vs Brooke Richter / Karen Camp7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulia Joncas / MaryLou Knight vs Kim Zizza / Erika Aldazabal6-4, 3-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Neri / Kim Andersen vs Cathy Gibney DiColo / Barbara Gradley2-6, 2-6
2022-07-20vs HOF: ZizzaWon 30
W#1 DoublesEszter Chase / Josie Richmond vs Brooke Richter / Linda Chapman6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichele Stern / Karen Neri vs Sally Doire / Cynthia Sexton6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Block / Julia Joncas vs Kim Zizza / Alice Porter6-4, 0-6, 5-3
2022-07-13vs MB: BretonLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Block / Margot Bloom vs Julia Bush / Karin Morse6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEszter Chase / Josie Richmond vs Pamela Lomerson / Mary Jo McEldowney6-4, 4-6, 1-3
W#3 DoublesMichele Stern / MaryLou Knight vs Lisa Brosofsky / Amy Curell6-3, 6-4
2022-06-14vs MB: BretonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKerry Chaffer / Josie Richmond vs Julia Bush / Karin Morse6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMargot Bloom / Julia Joncas vs Pamela Lomerson / Mary Jo McEldowney2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKim Andersen / Kathy Block vs Tracy Breton / Thea O Donnell1-6, 3-6
2022-06-01vs MB: BretonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichele Stern / Tamara Gorski vs Julia Bush / Amy Curell2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEszter Chase / Josie Richmond vs Mary Jo McEldowney / Kazue Yamamoto4-6, 6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Block / Kim Andersen vs Polly Handy / Lisa Brosofsky2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Margot Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Josie Richmond
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.59
MaryLou Knight
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Karen Neri
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Kathy Block
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.17
Kim Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eszter Chase
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Julia Joncas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kerry Chaffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tamara Gorski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eszter Chase + Josie Richmond213 matchesnot enough data
Julia Joncas + Kim Andersen213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Neri + MaryLou Knight303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margot Bloom
129W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
Josie Richmond
41W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
MaryLou Knight
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.59
Karen Neri
19W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Kathy Block
15W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Kim Andersen
21W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Eszter Chase
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julia Joncas
5W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kerry Chaffer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tamara Gorski
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.