Teams

CSRC RAMSEY

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs CCW SCOTTWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra VanDeVeer / Carre Bistline vs Jeanne Osborn / Margaret Hill6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Alice Ratcliffe vs Stacy Mills / Heather Tiffany6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCoretta Russell / Brecklyn Garza vs Marilyn McGee / Kristine Yancy6-3, 6-3
2025-05-19vs FLYHS BARTHELMESLost 23
L#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Alice Ratcliffe vs Joy Carroll / Kristy Pring3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBrecklyn Garza vs Lindsey Solko6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarre Bistline / Debra VanDeVeer vs Jamie Horspool / Melissa Biewenga6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesCoretta Russell vs Alice Bauder3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Swenson / Amy Phillips vs Holly Lane / Esperanza Campbell3-6, 3-6
2025-05-12vs CSCC DAVISWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Alice Ratcliffe vs Melissa Gateley / Amanda Schneider6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarre Bistline / Debra VanDeVeer vs Patrice Tafolla / Jacqueline Skaggs6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCoretta Russell / Brecklyn Garza vs Diane Wilborn / Gloria Carpenter6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-05vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 05
L#1 DoublesJudith Ertel / Carre Bistline vs Jane Glimco / Susan Shaink1-6, 1-3
L#1 SinglesBrecklyn Garza vs Jenn Hull3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Debra VanDeVeer vs Amy Sauerland / Lisa Ostly2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCoretta Russell vs Hannah Geiger3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Swenson / Amy Phillips vs Judi Ashmen / Dana Kennedy5-7, 0-6
2025-04-28vs CCOC MCFARLANDLost 23
W#1 DoublesJudith Ertel / Carre Bistline vs Anne Janda / Barbara Jean Knorr7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrecklyn Garza vs Kit McFarland2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDebra VanDeVeer / Alice Ratcliffe vs Suzanne Book / Irene Larimer7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCoretta Russell vs Christie Lee4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Swenson / Amy Phillips vs R Abigail Yapor / Cynthia Lund3-6, 2-6
2025-04-21vs CCW SCOTTWon 41
W#1 DoublesAlice Ratcliffe / Debra VanDeVeer vs Margaret Hill / Jeanne Osborn6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCheri Ramsey vs Marilyn McGee6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmy Phillips / Nancy Swenson vs Mary Tostanoski / Callie Scott1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJudith Ertel vs Suzanne Bowland6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCoretta Russell / Brecklyn Garza vs Millicent Geers / Sunette Kleynhans3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-14vs FLYHS BARTHELMESWon 31
W#1 DoublesJudith Ertel / Debra VanDeVeer vs Melissa Biewenga / Andrea Murray6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheri Ramsey / Alice Ratcliffe vs Jamie Horspool / Tricia Campbell6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBrecklyn Garza vs Esperanza Campbell6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Swenson / Coretta Russell vs Joy Barthelmes / Denny Elston0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Alice Ratcliffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Cheri Ramsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Judith Ertel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Debra VanDeVeer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
Brecklyn Garza
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.67
Carre Bistline
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Coretta Russell
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
Nancy Swenson
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra VanDeVeer + Cheri Ramsey5453% games+6.3% vs expected
Alice Ratcliffe + Cheri Ramsey7256% games+2.7% vs expected
Debra VanDeVeer + Carre Bistline3450% games−1.1% vs expected
Carre Bistline + Judith Ertel2344% games−7.4% vs expected
Debra VanDeVeer + Alice Ratcliffe7357% gamesnot enough data
Debra VanDeVeer + Judith Ertel224 matchesnot enough data
Coretta Russell + Brecklyn Garza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alice Ratcliffe
60W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Cheri Ramsey
19W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Judith Ertel
28W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Debra VanDeVeer
48W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brecklyn Garza
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carre Bistline
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Coretta Russell
7W–13L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Nancy Swenson
1W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.