Teams

GLoFrese-TOCH

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-23vs ETurner-HRWon 21
L#1 SinglesHannah Harvey vs Colleen Cowperthwait4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Lindsey McIver6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAlexa Hartenstein vs Tina Prinstein6-4, 6-3
2026-06-16vs SBartle-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesHannah Harvey vs Cecilia Gonzales6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSheza Healey vs Shannon Bartle6-0, 6-1
2026-06-02vs AZebrowski-SVCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJuliana Maul vs Ashlyn Zebrowski3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesHannah Harvey vs Laura Gallaher6-1, 6-3
2026-05-26vs KCaravella-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Lena Basta0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesSheza Healey vs Mackenzie Sumwalt6-3, 6-2
2026-05-19vs KConklin-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Christina Pipkin0-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAlexa Hartenstein vs Mary Kathryn Oyaga3-6, 0-6
2026-05-15vs MWilliamson-DURSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAlexa Hartenstein vs Sloane Huntley2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-12vs EMcMurtrey-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesJuliana Maul vs Erin McMurtrey3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSheza Healey vs Xian Zhang6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAlexa Hartenstein vs Ciara Coughlin6-7, 4-6
2026-05-05vs PDavis-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesJuliana Maul vs Wilton Burns3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSheza Healey vs Jean Cormier1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 SinglesGretchen LoFrese vs Sophia Ewing6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Hannah Harvey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.95
Juliana Maul
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Sheza Healey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Gretchen LoFrese
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.78
Alexa Hartenstein
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gretchen LoFrese + Alexa Hartenstein4845% games−2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hannah Harvey
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Juliana Maul
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Sheza Healey
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Gretchen LoFrese
221W–139L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Alexa Hartenstein
112W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.