Teams

SLee (OPRC)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-01vs ETindel (Charlotte Country Club)Split 11
W#1 SinglesCaroleen Towery vs Andrea Harknett6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Filingeri / Angie Mehrizi vs Gigi Harris / Haley Cheek4-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs BHerman (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCaroleen Towery vs Jess Heath6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngie Mehrizi / Heather Dineen vs Brooks Herman / Karen Schaphorst6-0, 6-4
2023-04-17vs KDouglas (Firethorne Country Club)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Snead / Angie Mehrizi vs Danielle Fricke / Alisa Longo2-6, 2-6
2023-04-03vs MMcArdle (Weddington Chase)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCaroleen Towery vs Kelli Arenson6-1, 6-3
2023-03-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesCaroleen Towery / Nannette Markham vs Virginia Mitchell / Christina Wright6-0, 7-5
2023-02-27vs BHerman (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSurabhi Chopra / Angie Mehrizi vs Jennifer Ross / Karen Schaphorst6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Mallery Horton
published 3
2.83
Amber Filingeri
published 3
2.70
Tara Marcel
published
2.69
Angie Mehrizi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Caroleen Towery
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Heather Dineen
published
2.62
Nannette Markham
published
2.56
Surabhi Chopra
published
2.38
Lauren Packman
published
2.25
Amy Snead
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Mehrizi + Amber Filingeri5165% gamesnot enough data
Angie Mehrizi + Mallery Horton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mallery Horton
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Amber Filingeri
37W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Tara Marcel
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Angie Mehrizi
44W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Caroleen Towery
50W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Heather Dineen
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Nannette Markham
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
2.62
Surabhi Chopra
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%34%66%
2.56
Lauren Packman
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Amy Snead
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.