Teams

Cochran 18s 8.5 Combo M Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men 18 Thurs

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesNicholas Baxendell / John Hankinson vs Fred Ortmann / Freddy Ortmann6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChuck Burns / Matthew Cochran vs Enno de Vries / Akira Terui3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCharles Calkins / Eric Nocera vs Bryan Jones / Howard Driggers2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesNicholas Baxendell / John Hankinson vs Amiel Rossabi / Andy Rutledge2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuke Votaw / Chuck Burns vs Tommy Houston / Johan Nordmark3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTyler Paul / Samraat Saxena vs Jeff Fusaiotti / Philip Weikel5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCharles Calkins / Nicholas Baxendell vs Phillip Moore / Brian McLeod1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJ Stacey Allred / Matthew Cochran vs Aaron Strasser / Freddy Ortmann4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesNicholas Baxendell / John Hankinson vs Andy Rutledge / Philip Weikel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Keaney / Chas Smith vs Jeff Fusaiotti / Aadarsh Sivaprakash7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesStephen Davis / J Stacey Allred vs Brad Falvey / Myron Herron2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men 18 Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.69
John Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.08
Stephen Keaney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Tyler Paul
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chas Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Eric Nocera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Charles Calkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Luke Votaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Nicholas Baxendell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Matthew Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
J Stacey Allred
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Samraat Saxena
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Hankinson + Nicholas Baxendell213 matchesnot enough data
Nicholas Baxendell + Eric Nocera033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Hankinson
28W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
Stephen Keaney
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.08
Tyler Paul
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Chas Smith
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Eric Nocera
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Charles Calkins
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Luke Votaw
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Nicholas Baxendell
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Matthew Cochran
13W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
J Stacey Allred
12W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Samraat Saxena
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.