Teams

PONGSUGREE

2023 Loudoun Tri-Level 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-18vs KAPLAN/ZIMMERMANWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Stoltz / Kay Bransford vs Jennifer Hunter / Erin Green4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Coleman / Joanne Guerrera vs Catherine Mitchell / Kate Donadoni6-1, 6-2
2023-09-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesKay Bransford / Linda Pongsugree vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoanne Guerrera / Alexis Martin vs Catherine Mitchell / Moira Smith6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Maria Maebius
published
Colleen Stoltz
published 4.5
4.13
Jessica Coleman
published
4.04
Jennifer Beets
published
3.94
Joanne Guerrera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.59
Jennifer Larner
published
3.30
Mary Berkowitz
published
3.30
Alexis Martin
published 3.5
3.20
Mary Krueger
published
3.19
Kate Putt
published
Kerrie Jenkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Bransford + Joanne Guerrera614053% games−1.4% vs expected
Maria Maebius + Jennifer Beets224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Maebius
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Colleen Stoltz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Coleman
10W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
4.13
Jennifer Beets
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
4.04
4
Joanne Guerrera
112W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.94
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Jennifer Larner
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Mary Berkowitz
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Alexis Martin
24W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Mary Krueger
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Kerrie Jenkins
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.