Teams

Taylor/LF

2025 TUL ADULT 55 & Over League · 6.0 WOMEN

12 players · average NTRP 2.86 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-22vs Blue 2: Sacra/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather Harrod / Angela Garcia vs Christine Benningfield / Susan Hargis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Knight / Darla Knight vs Deborah Austin Johnson / Laura Keep6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristina Axtmann / Diane Paxson vs Barb Drotar / Patricia Stuart7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jenine Hembree
published
2.77
Lisa Kramer
published
Amy Knight
published 3
2.73
Diane Paxson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.42
Susan Cameron
published
2.38
Amber George
published 3
2.36
Heather Harrod
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Valerie Edgeller
published
2.26
Darla Knight
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.23
Kristine Taylor
published
2.18
Angela Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.07
Christina Axtmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Taylor + Darla Knight5848% games−1.3% vs expected
Angela Garcia + Darla Knight4448% games−4.7% vs expected
Angela Garcia + Heather Harrod1828% games−9.3% vs expected
Susan Cameron + Heather Harrod1732% games−10.8% vs expected
Valerie Edgeller + Heather Harrod1537% gamesnot enough data
Angela Garcia + Kristine Taylor2349% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Edgeller + Angela Garcia134 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Edgeller + Darla Knight134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenine Hembree
30W–20L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Lisa Kramer
43W–31L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Knight
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Paxson
43W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Susan Cameron
27W–47L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42
3
Amber George
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.38
3
Heather Harrod
19W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
Valerie Edgeller
25W–53L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.36
3
Darla Knight
58W–98L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.26
Kristine Taylor
53W–77L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Angela Garcia
44W–109L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Christina Axtmann
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.