Teams

Brown

2021 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Winter Ladies Day · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-03-25vs ChenLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Prominski / Lisa Means vs Sandy Snyder / Amy Horton1-6, 2-6
2021-03-22vs DobsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Rapp / Shirin Ahmed vs Corinne Boisi / Alison Wang2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-03-19vs ManorWon 10
W#2 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Cynthia Rapp vs Cybelle Long / Melisssa Hacopian7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2021-03-11vs ManorLost 01
L#1 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Cynthia Rapp vs Kelley Donellan / Lisa Johnson3-6, 1-6
2021-03-08vs FishkindWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Fliakas / Lisa Means vs Annie Carey / Corlyn Krinsky3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-03-01vs ChenWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Means / Brigid Brakefield vs Amy Horton / Sandy Snyder6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-02-22vs DobsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesShirin Ahmed / Cynthia Rapp vs Susan Olan / Brauna Martin7-6, 2-3
2021-02-08vs FishkindLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Means / Stephanie Fliakas vs Ilene Fishkind / Linda McArthur1-6, 3-6
2021-01-29vs ManorWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Means / Joanna McCleaf vs Karen Dugan / Diana DePaul7-6, 6-3
2021-01-26vs DobsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesCynthia Rapp / Shirin Ahmed vs Audrey Wasser / Cindy Pohoryles6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-01-20vs FishkindLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Means / Stacey Brown vs Linda McArthur / Noelle Lynch2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Cynthia Rapp
published 3.5
Brigid Brakefield
published 3.5
3.17
Shirin Ahmed
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.04
Christy Evans
published 3.5
2.94
Lisa Means
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Dunia Pasternak
published 3
Joanna McCleaf
published
Mary Toro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Rapp
36W–30L career · no lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Brigid Brakefield
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Shirin Ahmed
198W–134L career · 5 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Christy Evans
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 6 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Dunia Pasternak
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Joanna McCleaf
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Toro
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.