Teams

WTC - Deck 18 & Over 3.5 Women

2026 Dothan USTA Adult 18 & Over Fall League · 3.5 Women Sunday Afternoon

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-19vs DO - PerryLost 12
W#1 DoublesMillie Watson / Carie Crowley vs Jennifer Gonzalez / Angie Mcdaniel7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChelsea Petrey vs Helen Mendheim4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Margo Black vs Madison Laye / Van Hughes1-6, 0-6
2025-11-16vs DO - PerryLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Deck / Kimberly Griger vs Allison Edwards / Caitlin Perry7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesBernadette Haskins vs Jennifer Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Carlene Sessions vs Jessica Givens / Jenny Nelson1-6, 4-6
2025-11-09vs DO - PerryWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarlene Sessions / Carie Crowley vs Margaret Poston / Payton Ball6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMillie Watson vs Helen Mendheim5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Elizabeth Odom vs Jenny Nelson / Allison Edwards7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-02vs DO - PerryLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Deck / Chelsea Petrey vs Helen Mendheim / Allison Edwards4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVicki Bitney vs Karelia Castillo1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Odom / Carlene Sessions vs Payton Ball / Holly Sharp3-6, 2-6
2025-10-26vs DO - PerryLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarlene Sessions / Margo Black vs Jessica Givens / Madison Laye2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMillie Watson vs Callie Ventress3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Griger / Jessica Deck vs Leslie Casiple / Angie Mcdaniel6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAmanda Roberson / Bernadette Haskins vs Margaret Poston / Caitlin Perry1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women Sunday Afternoon
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DO - Perry5015511109
2WTC - Deck 18 & Over 3.5 Women0551531219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kimberly Griger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Elizabeth Odom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Carie Crowley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Jessica Deck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Carlene Sessions
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Chelsea Petrey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
3.04
Millie Watson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.94
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.38
Bernadette Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Margo Black
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Andrews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Griger + Jessica Deck404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Griger
14W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Elizabeth Odom
176W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carie Crowley
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Jessica Deck
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Carlene Sessions
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3
Chelsea Petrey
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Millie Watson
10W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Vicki Bitney
4W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
2.5
Bernadette Haskins
3W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Margo Black
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Andrews
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.