Teams

OC LLW Coto De Caza - Angela

2026 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 2.5 W WD

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharish Crane / Elizabeth Tiplady vs Kennedy Loenhorst / Jill Facer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Tiplady / Tatiana Beebe vs Paula Mendez / Jen Y.6-4, 6-4
2026-06-02vs Mission Viejo CC - Kristin - 1030Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Dunteman / Elizabeth Tiplady vs Riley Lee / Kristin Almieri6-3, 6-2
2026-05-19vs OC Dana Hills TC - Becky - 10Split 11
W#1 DoublesJessica Ferraro / Lauren Carter vs Becky Tribett / Kennedy Loenhorst6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrandy Edwards / Jennifer Martinez vs Jenna Neff / Krisen Tashjian4-6, 0-6
2026-05-08Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennine Gilmer / Elizabeth Tiplady vs Jill Johnsen / Nicole Philo2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBuget Frantz / Brianna Aldrich vs Bre Daly / Paula Mendez6-7, 4-6
2026-05-05vs Mission Viejo CC - Kristin - 1030Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Ferraro / Lauren Carter vs Maria Aceves / Riley Lee6-0, 6-1
2026-04-30Won 20
W#1 SinglesJessica Ferraro vs Jill Facer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Tiplady / Tatiana Beebe vs Allison Guillen / Laura Pulsipher4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-17vs Mission Viejo CC - Kristin - 1030Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrianna Aldrich / Brianna Jonsson vs Nikki Lord / Cheryl Flohr4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · OC 2.5 W WD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OC LLW Coto De Caza - Angela7219819169
2OC Dana Hills TC - Becky - 1072171023199
3OC Nellie Gail - Woodhill - 103045131431239
4Mission Viejo CC - Kristin - 10300952245288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Jessica Ferraro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Brandy Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brianna Aldrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Elizabeth Tiplady
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jennine Gilmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Ferraro
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Brandy Edwards
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brianna Aldrich
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Tiplady
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Jennine Gilmer
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.