Teams

Hilliard 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2026 Piedmont GRETA Fall Singles · 4.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs Harrison 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesSeungil Park vs Chris Leggette0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesHuy Ho vs Scot Harrison2-6, 1-6
2026-08-26vs Wellons 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 20
W#1 SinglesHuy Ho vs Rob Newman1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesChris Hanger vs Scott Wellons6-4, 6-3
2026-08-19vs Mitchell 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 10
W#2 SinglesHuy Ho vs Chris Apple6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hilliard 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM1030114
2Davis 4.0 Fall Singles1030114
3Lara 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM1030234
4Mitchell 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM0103634
5Wellons 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM0103635
6Harrison 4.0M Fall Singles Wed PM0103635

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Huy Ho
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
J Stacey Allred
published 4
3.50
Ryan Hilliard
published
3.47
Chris Hanger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Seungil Park
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Hanger + Huy Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Huy Ho
17W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
J Stacey Allred
12W–35L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Ryan Hilliard
40W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Chris Hanger
31W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Seungil Park
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.