Teams

Bahorski

2025 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W Adult 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Jennifer Winegardner vs Anna Jones / Michelle Eubanks2-6, 3-6
2025-04-20vs KjellerupLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Elizabeth Murray vs Joan Bassett / Debbie Moss5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Emily Serpico vs Junko Stout / Jacqueline Larson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAskal Ali / Aimee Lim vs Melissa Johnson / Melissa Jaacks6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-05vs KjellerupWon 20
W#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Jennifer Winegardner vs Melissa Jaacks / Gina Herring7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAskal Ali / Aimee Lim vs Kim Thriffiley / Melissa Johnson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-25vs WarnerLost 01
L#3 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Jennifer Winegardner vs Anna Jones / Lisa Graganella4-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs WarnerLost 02
L#1 SinglesAskal Ali vs Jennifer Britt4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVickie Morgan-Gates / Jennifer Winegardner vs Michelle Eubanks / Amy Otis6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Emily Serpico
published
3.83
Tiffany Jones
published
3.82
Catherine Reid
published 4
3.77
Elizabeth Murray
published
3.67
Askal Ali
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Gina Bell
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Sherry Cady
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.38
Vickie Morgan-Gates
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.23
Aimee Lim
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Winegardner + Sherry Cady4740% games−1.6% vs expected
Vickie Morgan-Gates + Jennifer Winegardner4849% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Winegardner + Askal Ali303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Winegardner + Gina Bell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Serpico
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
Tiffany Jones
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Catherine Reid
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Askal Ali
106W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Gina Bell
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Sherry Cady
196W–173L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
4
Vickie Morgan-Gates
35W–70L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Aimee Lim
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.