Teams

Williams Y - Farwell

2023 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-30vs Glen Kernan - SanyalWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Davila / Andy Fricke vs Telis Assimenios / Ernst Bell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-25vs Marsh Creek - HolubWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndy Fricke vs Kevin Kohn6-2, 7-5
2023-03-02vs Eagle Harbor - WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Phillips / Charles McGehee vs Adam Mercer / Jim Pinkerman4-6, 3-6
2023-02-04vs Boone Park - LeWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndy Fricke vs Derek Copeland6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCharles McGehee / Robert Phillips vs Paul Asuncion / Tony Camarce4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-01-28vs Jax Golf - DuranWon 10
W#1 SinglesAndy Fricke vs Ed Duran6-1, 6-1
2023-01-14vs San Jose - ZambettiLost 01
L#1 SinglesAndy Fricke vs Roli Selfors1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Jesse Rogers
published
3.46
Erik Berger
published
3.39
Andy Fricke
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Charles McGehee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
David Weinand
published 3.5
3.23
Richard Rivas
published
3.23
Craig Mele
published 3.5
3.17
Louis Posick
published
3.12
David Drill
published 3.5
3.09
Ron Todaro
published
3.06
Charles Waide
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Cabler
published
Ed Davila
published
Kenneth Black
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Posick + Mark Cabler4347% games+1.2% vs expected
Charles McGehee + Andy Fricke134 matchesnot enough data
Craig Mele + David Weinand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jesse Rogers
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Erik Berger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Andy Fricke
106W–71L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Charles McGehee
46W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
David Weinand
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Rivas
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Craig Mele
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
Louis Posick
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
David Drill
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Ron Todaro
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.09
3.5
Charles Waide
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Mark Cabler
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
Ed Davila
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Black
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.