Teams

Renwick-40/3.5/M/Tchefunte

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-12Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Nash / Mark Maher vs Maxwell Agnew / Ryan Fournier1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Becker / Charles Renwick vs Michael Lane / Ross Doyle1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNader Shourbaji / Mark Maher vs Mark Farrow / Richard Kramer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Morgan / Mark Maher vs Joshua Walker / Alan Schluter2-6, 3-6
2025-02-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Tusa / Brian Becker vs Jason Catt / Ronald Santos3-6, 3-6
2025-01-30Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMark Maher / Jeffrey Hufft vs Roderick Chandler / Ben Brown5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Becker / Mike Morgan vs Mark Farrow / Jason Rolling1-6, 4-6
2025-01-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCharles Renwick / Brian Becker vs Joshua Walker / Ellis Iverson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Charles Renwick
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published 3.5
Brian Becker
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Michael Bethea
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.92
Chris Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Clinton Capdepon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Evan Graybill
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Jeffrey Hufft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Marco Hidalgo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Maher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michael Tilly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Nader Shourbaji
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Ryan Nash
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Scott Gutterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Timothy Wolfe
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Tilly + Ryan Nash213 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Hufft + Mike Morgan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Renwick
11W–11L career · 17 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Brian Becker
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bethea
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
3
Chris Tusa
8W–36L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Clinton Capdepon
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Evan Graybill
0W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Hufft
2W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marco Hidalgo
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Maher
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Tilly
5W–8L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Morgan
5W–22L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nader Shourbaji
8W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Nash
11W–16L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Gutterman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Wolfe
2W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.