Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Miyazaki

2025 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · mixed 10.0 18 & over

14 players · average NTRP 4.79 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-15vs Wasatch Hills-Flowers/CountyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Rist / Matt Sweet vs Sidnee Lavatai / Brian Schmeer7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2025-06-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Hardin / Ashley Tanner vs Leif Thulin / Zeynep Naz Ozturk2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesCorbin Benson / Katherine Rist vs Toon Hobbs / Micah Alba6-3, 7-6
2025-05-04vs Wasatch Hills-Flowers/CountyLost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Hardin / Ashley Tanner vs Sidnee Lavatai / Micah Alba4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for mixed 10.0 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.00
Amanda Pratzel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Corbin Benson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.69
Matt Sweet
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.55
Ashley Tanner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.41
Jason Hardin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.39
Ashley Miyazaki
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Katherine Rist
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Cole Paterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Megan Horter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.13
Arthur Miyazaki
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.06
Nittaya Phonharath
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.05
Jason Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Paige Miles
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Miyazaki + Arthur Miyazaki37561% games+18.0% vs expected
Amanda Pratzel + Cole Paterson8168% gamesnot enough data
Jason Smith + Ashley Miyazaki5255% gamesnot enough data
Amanda Pratzel + Arthur Miyazaki7069% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Miyazaki + Matt Sweet5064% gamesnot enough data
Paige Miles + Arthur Miyazaki314 matchesnot enough data
Cole Paterson + Katherine Rist134 matchesnot enough data
Arthur Miyazaki + Nittaya Phonharath224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amanda Pratzel
62W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
5.00
5
Christopher Arena
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
5
Corbin Benson
16W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Sweet
44W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
4.69
5
Ashley Tanner
43W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
Jason Hardin
82W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.41
4.5
Ashley Miyazaki
106W–38L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
4.39
Katherine Rist
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Cole Paterson
46W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
4.22
Megan Horter
13W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
4.14
4.5
Arthur Miyazaki
126W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Nittaya Phonharath
72W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jason Smith
50W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Paige Miles
16W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.