Teams

Team 3 Aim Set Smash

2023 NOVA Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-13vs Team 4 FOREVER YOUNGLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Burke Fox / Victoria Huttar vs Diane Diner / Kate Putt4-6, 4-3
2023-06-09vs Team 2 PyszkaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJo Ann Moore / Mary Crespy vs Suzanne McMullen / Elizabeth Pyszka6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Oberleitner / Lisa Greenfield vs Jennifer Malloy / Kimberly Butler6-3, 6-5
2023-06-06vs Team 5 Net Force DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesVictoria Huttar / Tara MacCall vs Joan Donoghue / Debbie Kem6-1, 4-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Oberleitner / Tina Cardenas vs Bethany Mathis / Lynn Koggan7-5, 2-3
2023-06-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Crespy / Mary Ellen Giuseppe vs Donna Lee / Janine Sweeney6-4, 6-5
2023-05-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesMary Ellen Giuseppe / Mary Crespy vs Lynn Koggan / Susan Hanback6-1, 6-0
2023-05-23vs Team 4 FOREVER YOUNGWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Crespy / Jo Ann Moore vs Mary Berkowitz / Carly Mul7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-19vs Team 2 PyszkaWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Crespy / Mary Ellen Giuseppe vs Karen Collazo / Lisa Arbo6-2, 6-1
2023-05-16vs Team 5 Net Force DayWon 20
W#2 DoublesMary Crespy / Mary Burke Fox vs Bethany Mathis / Anne Ward6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTina Cardenas / Victoria Huttar vs Christine Driscoll / Lynn Koggan6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mary Crespy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
published
3.29
Ann Storck
published 3.5
3.21
De Ann Boehm
published 3.5
3.20
Victoria Huttar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Jo Ann Moore
published
3.20
Mary Burke Fox
published
3.19
Constance Seid
published 3.5
3.10
Tara MacCall
published
2.77
Linda Oberleitner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Stacy Rodrigues
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Crespy
111W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Mary Ellen Giuseppe
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Ann Storck
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
De Ann Boehm
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Victoria Huttar
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Jo Ann Moore
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Mary Burke Fox
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Constance Seid
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Tara MacCall
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Linda Oberleitner
36W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Stacy Rodrigues
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.