Teams

Indy A40 3.5M NCHS Hurley

Summer USTA Central Indiana Adult 40 & Over · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Men, S

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-16vs Indy A40 3.5M WIRC DavisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Harmon / Chris Gunderson vs Alan Gnani / David Wright7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesWill Phillips vs Kurt White1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Hurley / BRYAN JACKSON vs Tyson Smith / Scott Bushey6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDuane Lay / Michael Turner vs Brent Stiers / Roger Davis5-7, 3-6
2026-07-08vs Indy A40 3.5M CRC CostlowLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Gunderson / Jeffery Dack vs ABHIJIT DAS / Claudio Troncoso6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBRYAN JACKSON vs Vitaliy Koval3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesThomas Hurley / David Harmon vs Daniel Nelson / Christopher Kinsey7-6, 1-4, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMark Klein / Duane Lay vs Mauricio Manzur / Eduardo Mendizabal2-6, 6-7
2026-07-01vs Indy A40 3.5M IRCD PuckettLost 13
L#1 DoublesDavid Harmon / Will Phillips vs Tom Anderson / Chris Paberzs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJeffery Dack vs Scott Deig6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBRYAN JACKSON / Michael Turner vs Jason Farris / Sandeep Pathuri6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDuane Lay / Robert Johnson vs Chris Ficklin / Drew Darby6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs Indy A40 3.5M DCC HayesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChris Gunderson / David Harmon vs Thomas Dempsey / Phil Mahoney6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBRYAN JACKSON vs Matt Sifferlen3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Hurley / Michael Turner vs David Tutrone / David Widjaja2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChris Happel / Duane Lay vs Moon Kim / Jeffrey Good6-0, 6-1
2026-06-17vs Indy A40 3.5M IRCD SinghLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffery Dack / Chris Gunderson vs Aaron McClure / Michael Taylor6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesThomas Hurley / Will Phillips vs Damian Rosales / Timothy Fuller6-2, 6-4
L#4 DoublesMark Klein / Duane Lay vs Steven Walsmith / Neal Burnett4-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs Indy A40 3.5M HawGCC ChopLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Hurley / Chris Gunderson vs Sean Leonard / Troy Kafka2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJeffery Dack vs Jeff Wawok4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Turner / BRYAN JACKSON vs Todd Eikenberry / Joe DILLON2-6, 4-6
2026-06-03vs Indy A40 3.5M TBC PetersonLost 12
L#1 SinglesWill Phillips vs Eric Douthit6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Hurley / David Harmon vs Todd Howard / Mike Rhinehart6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Johnson / Jeffery Dack vs Dave DeCraene / Stephen Dudash6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · CIN Indy 40 & Over 3.5 Men, S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh6126922246
2Indy A40 3.5M HawGCC Chop6126924239
3Indy A40 3.5M CRC Costlow6126929274
4Indy A40 3.5M WIRC Davis34161943335
5Indy A40 3.5M TBC Peterson25132246329
6Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Puckett25142149336
7Indy A40 3.5M DCC Hayes2582755382
8Indy A40 3.5M NCHS Hurley16112453358

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Chris Gunderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jeffery Dack
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Thomas Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.13
BRYAN JACKSON
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Will Phillips
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Joe Sannella
published
2.98
Duane Lay
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Klein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hurley + Duane Lay2444% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Hurley + Chris Gunderson3254% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Hurley + Jeffery Dack134 matchesnot enough data
Will Phillips + Jeffery Dack123 matchesnot enough data
Will Phillips + Duane Lay123 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Hurley + BRYAN JACKSON213 matchesnot enough data
Jeffery Dack + Chris Gunderson123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffery Dack + Duane Lay213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Gunderson
28W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Jeffery Dack
35W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Thomas Hurley
42W–56L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
BRYAN JACKSON
38W–49L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Will Phillips
12W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Joe Sannella
16W–33L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Duane Lay
26W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
Mark Klein
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.