Teams

Tiong - Team Courtmasters

2025 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.65 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-27Won 20
W#1 DoublesVijay Kalanadhabhatta / Jason Pallady vs Amit Kumar Jha / William Melis6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJose Ricardo Cornista / Siva Jagadeesan vs Jordan Citron / Sean Henry6-4, 6-3
2025-07-17vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSean Klinge / Jose Ricardo Cornista vs Anup Dandekar / FARRUKH RAHMAN6-1, 6-4
2025-07-11vs Rentsch- ChallengersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJose Ricardo Cornista / Scott Hataway vs Frank Pan / Bruce Henshel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Samodal / Simon Storm vs Ben Moss / FARRUKH RAHMAN6-1, 7-6
2025-07-07vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 20
W#1 DoublesChris Bokel / Scott Hataway vs Ron Haimowitz / Bruce Henshel6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesViswas Pola / Sean Klinge vs FARRUKH RAHMAN / John Sobieray6-1, 6-1
2025-07-02vs Melis - Loudoun LobstersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoel Velasquez / Andrew Schmidt vs Praveen Mullacherry / Patrice Haspil6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSimon Storm / Scott Hataway vs Sean Henry / Jordan Citron2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVijay Kalanadhabhatta / Jose Ricardo Cornista vs Paul Ebersole / Adam Briggs7-6, 6-1
2025-06-24vs Melis - Loudoun LobstersWon 30
W#1 DoublesSimon Storm / Jason Pallady vs Santhosh Potti / Jordan Citron6-3, 5-5
W#2 DoublesJoel Velasquez / Andrew Schmidt vs Paul Joseph / Hung Le6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Bokel / Scott Hataway vs Patrice Haspil / Scott Johnson6-2, 6-4
2025-06-05vs Rentsch- ChallengersWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoel Velasquez / Benjamin Butler vs Anup Dandekar / FARRUKH RAHMAN7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChris Bokel / Jose Ricardo Cornista vs Frank Pan / John Sobieray6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSiva Jagadeesan / Sean Klinge vs James Rentsch / Wallace Higginbotham6-0, 6-4
2025-06-02vs Melis - Loudoun LobstersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoel Velasquez / Scott Hataway vs Jordan Citron / Scott Johnson6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesViswas Pola / Vishnu Chunduru vs Santhosh Potti / Paul Joseph2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Jason Pallady
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Siva Jagadeesan
published
3.56
Chris Bokel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Joel Velasquez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Doan Nguyen
published
3.46
Scott Hataway
published
3.46
James Cheong
published
3.44
Vishnu Chunduru
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Viswas Pola
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jose Ricardo Cornista
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Sean Klinge
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Freddy Feliz
published
3.21
Robert Samodal
published
3.19
Simon Storm
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Andrew Schmidt
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vijay Kalanadhabhatta + Jason Pallady10366% games+14.6% vs expected
Siva Jagadeesan + Vishnu Chunduru4166% games+6.6% vs expected
Viswas Pola + Vishnu Chunduru3254% gamesnot enough data
Freddy Feliz + James Cheong213 matchesnot enough data
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta + Jose Ricardo Cornista213 matchesnot enough data
Sean Klinge + Viswas Pola123 matchesnot enough data
Simon Storm + Vishnu Chunduru303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
105W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Jason Pallady
84W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Siva Jagadeesan
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
3.5
Chris Bokel
83W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
4
Joel Velasquez
68W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Doan Nguyen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.49
Scott Hataway
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
James Cheong
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Vishnu Chunduru
32W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Viswas Pola
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Jose Ricardo Cornista
40W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Sean Klinge
78W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Freddy Feliz
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Robert Samodal
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Simon Storm
75W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Andrew Schmidt
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.