Teams

BC-LLW-WestEnd/TimClaar

2023 ADULT 55 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-25vs BC-PVTC/JeromeHaigWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Willson / Tracy Hyman vs Arthur Chen / Ivan Salazar6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJuan Tueros / Thomas Schlack vs Matt Gilman / Edward Charles6-2, 6-0
2023-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatthew Willson / Tracy Hyman vs Scott Brown / Eric Knudson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-10vs BC-PVTC/JeromeHaigWon 10
W#3 DoublesJuan Tueros / Thomas Schlack vs Arthur Chen / Matt Gilman6-4, 6-3
2023-05-27vs BC-MCC/RemcoWallerWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Keenan / Tracy Hyman vs Remco Waller / Edward Han6-4, 6-2
2023-05-21vs BC-PVTC/JeromeHaigSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Tracy Hyman vs Matt Gilman / Brian Beach6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Margolis / Juan Tueros vs Wade Murphy / Arthur Chen4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Philip Evatt
published
4.27
Thomas Schlack
published
Daniel Margolis
published 4.5
4.24
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
published 4.5
4.18
Tracy Hyman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Juan Tueros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Yun Kim
published
Matthew Willson
published
Tim Claar
published
Tony Yang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Evatt + Tracy Hyman4257% games+0.9% vs expected
Carlos Cruz-Aedo + Tracy Hyman12956% gamesnot enough data
Juan Tueros + Carlos Cruz-Aedo4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Evatt
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
Thomas Schlack
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Daniel Margolis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Tracy Hyman
122W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Juan Tueros
66W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
Yun Kim
39W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Matthew Willson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Claar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tony Yang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.