Teams

Womack - Dbls 3.5W

2022 Piedmont Summer Daze Doubles · Summer Daze 3.5 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer Daze 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Annie Chapman
published 3.5
3.35
Gracie Womack
published 3.5
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.26
Cindy Sumner
published 3.5
Alicia Brewer
published 3.5
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
3.07
Patti Morgan
published
3.06
Debra Jessup
published 3.5
2.93
Brandy Gillenwater
published 3.5
Lisa Cook
published
Lisa Liringis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Fogleman + Lisa Liringis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 16 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Annie Chapman
19W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Sumner
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Alicia Brewer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Patti Morgan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Debra Jessup
10W–21L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Brandy Gillenwater
6W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Liringis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.