Teams

ANP.McNeill

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-25vs TOC.GriswoldLost 02
L#1 SinglesBryan Light vs Alessandro Montanari4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Hagen vs Josiah Chen1-6, 1-6
2026-08-12vs TOC.GriswoldLost 02
L#1 SinglesYiqiao Xu vs Josiah Chen1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Hagen vs Nishant Nayudu1-6, 2-6
2026-08-04vs MD.FearringtonSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAustin McNeill vs David Zies0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMatt McNeill vs Brian Tanaka6-2, 7-5
2026-07-28vs TOC.TandonLost 03
L#1 SinglesRyan Hagen vs Jaikumaran Ganapathysamy1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesYiqiao Xu vs Sachin Sharma0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMatt McNeill vs Arvind Gupta0-6, 2-6
2026-07-21vs TOC.GriswoldLost 03
L#1 SinglesBryan Light vs Nishant Nayudu3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesYiqiao Xu vs Ian Lay2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesAustin McNeill vs Doug Griswold1-6, 1-6
2026-07-14vs MD.FearringtonLost 12
L#1 SinglesRyan Hagen vs Brian Tanaka1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMatt McNeill vs James Hart4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAustin McNeill vs Robert Wiltberger4-6, 0-6
2026-06-26vs TOC.TandonLost 12
L#1 SinglesBryan Light vs Ram Basireddy3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRyan Hagen vs Sachin Sharma2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesYiqiao Xu vs Jaikumaran Ganapathysamy6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-23vs MD.FearringtonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesYiqiao Xu vs Brian Tanaka3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBryan Light vs James Hart6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Summer Singles 18 & Over 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MD.Fearrington62131128227
2TOC.Griswold4313816135
3ANP.McNeill0751636234

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Bryan Light
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.83
Matt McNeill
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.77
Ryan Hagen
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
2.42
Austin McNeill
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.31
Patrick Mcdade
published
2.24
Yiqiao Xu
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bryan Light
5W–6L career · type T · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Matt McNeill
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Ryan Hagen
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Austin McNeill
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Patrick Mcdade
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Yiqiao Xu
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.