Teams

Young/40/4.5/MXD/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 40 & Over · 4.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-27vs Truong/40/4.5/MXD/POTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGrace Rogers / Son Nguyen vs Stewart Rabb / Kristen Bernard6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSomer Young / Jared Fry vs Emily Truong / Grady Wilson0-1
2025-06-19vs Truong/40/4.5/MXD/POTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTammy Cannon / John Jeffries vs Stewart Rabb / Kristen Bernard6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJared Fry / Carla Hildebrand vs Carolyn Bickham / Brian Bernard4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-11vs Truong/40/4.5/MXD/POTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Curley / Tammy Cannon vs Woodus Humphrey / Margaret Elberson1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJason Doerner / Carla Hildebrand vs Malini Howard / Stevie Schmidt0-6, 4-6
2025-05-28vs Truong/40/4.5/MXD/POTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJared Fry / Tammy Cannon vs Margaret Elberson / Grady Wilson6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJason Doerner / Carla Hildebrand vs Emily Truong / Brian Bernard4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-05vs Truong/40/4.5/MXD/POTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Doerner / Tammy Cannon vs Stewart Rabb / Margaret Elberson3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSomer Young / Jared Fry vs Woodus Humphrey / Malini Howard6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarla Hildebrand / Son Nguyen vs Grady Wilson / Emily Truong2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Carla Hildebrand
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.02
Tammy Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.02
Jared Fry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Jason Doerner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
John Jeffries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Grace Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Jason Curley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Timothy Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Somer Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Hildebrand + Jared Fry134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carla Hildebrand
19W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Tammy Cannon
20W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jared Fry
34W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Jason Doerner
17W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
John Jeffries
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Grace Rogers
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jason Curley
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Timothy Ellis
25W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Somer Young
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.