Teams

SS-LT RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-17vs LTFC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesMaria Banta vs Erin Wade6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Diane Lopez vs Christine Paulsson / Anasa Shank2-6, 0-6
2023-08-28vs HW GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesSandy Stocker / LISA HAGEN vs Meredith van Wyk / Jill Smith2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMISSY GOLDBERG vs Lauren Francis6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Diane Lopez vs Christy Serenyi / CC Dick6-3, 6-1
2023-08-21vs HFII BLACKWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaria Banta / Sandy Stocker vs Christine McCarthy / Lauren Landen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-14vs HG PINKWon 10
W#1 SinglesMISSY GOLDBERG vs Mollie Smith7-5, 6-2
2023-08-10vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesMISSY GOLDBERG / Elizabeth Freestone vs Chris Thulin / Cody Sherrod2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-07vs RRTC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Sandy Stocker vs Heather McGinnis / Samantha Downing5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-07-24vs HRCA-N PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesLISA HAGEN / Sandy Stocker vs Kathleen Samuelli / Claudia Swanson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
MISSY GOLDBERG
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Wendy Mosley
published
3.28
Elizabeth Freestone
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Sandy Stocker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Diane Lopez
published 3.5
Amanda Caldwell
published 3.5
3.20
Maria Banta
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Melissa Wiseman
published
3.05
LISA HAGEN
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LISA HAGEN + Sandy Stocker3743% games−5.7% vs expected
Elizabeth Freestone + MISSY GOLDBERG3255% gamesnot enough data
MISSY GOLDBERG + Maria Banta404 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Wiseman + Wendy Mosley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
MISSY GOLDBERG
90W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Wendy Mosley
27W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Elizabeth Freestone
140W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Sandy Stocker
125W–96L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Diane Lopez
27W–18L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amanda Caldwell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Maria Banta
117W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Melissa Wiseman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
LISA HAGEN
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.