Teams

APEX:InfiniteJesters:Stodder

2024 ME Fall Tri Level · Men's 3.0

4 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-16vs MP:Boyle:BoyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Stodder / Nick Bevins vs Eric Chapman / Chris Ouellette0-6, 0-6
2024-11-03vs APEX:Racketeers:DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Courtney / Ian Curran vs Tsz Wong / Subrata Das3-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs APEX:Racketeers:DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Stodder / Ian Curran vs Tsz Wong / Subrata Das6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-19vs MP:Boyle:BoyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesIan Curran / Tim Tyler vs Eric Chapman / Chris Ouellette3-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs APEX:Racketeers:DouglassLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Courtney / Tim Tyler vs Cameron Douglass / Subrata Das4-6, 3-6
2024-10-06vs MP:Boyle:BoyleLost 01
L#1 DoublesNick Bevins / Mark Stodder vs Matthew Boyle / Luke Lyndaker0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men's 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MP:Boyle:Boyle6060028
2APEX:Racketeers:Douglass3333758
3APEX:InfiniteJesters:Stodder06061270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Tim Tyler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Courtney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Stodder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nick Bevins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Stodder + Nick Bevins044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Tyler
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Jon Courtney
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Stodder
0W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nick Bevins
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.