Teams

SS-H RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-15vs LTFC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Mease / Meg Satherlie vs Elizabeth Bendalin / Lori Benson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Beverly Tellis vs Barb Hedges / Kim Ripka6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Deoni Levy vs Carol Jochens / Cristina Denezza6-4, 7-5
2025-07-08vs SS-LGT GREENWon 31
L#1 DoublesKatherine Nicolson / Susan Marshall vs Ki Kellen / Colleen Frank2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Sachs vs Adrienne Jaycox6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Bracken / Gloria Gonzalez vs Tracy Brunschwig / Kristin Danford6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHeather Reimann / Christina Walker vs Carla Bidwell / Mandy Paul6-4, 7-6
2025-07-01vs RRTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKara Gerczynski / Deoni Levy vs Tracy Hudson / Anja Mapstone4-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Nicolson / Sarah Bracken vs Juliana Okulski / Deborah Weis6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGloria Gonzalez / Leslie Mease vs Amanda Wootton / Dorothy Ripka7-6, 6-3
2025-06-24vs PCC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeoni Levy / Amy Hand vs Lisa Damico Anderson / Shannon Doyle6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDusty Fitzgerald / Michelle Sachs vs Tanja Sukovic / Hanni Deters3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMeg Satherlie / Sarah Bracken vs Shawna Walker / Vicky Mediate6-2, 6-1
2025-06-17vs GAC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Mease / Susan Marshall vs Chelsea Ye / Loretta Chang6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeg Satherlie / Stephanie Zaitz vs Katie Deline / Claire Douthit4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Kara Gerczynski vs Kirsten Handler / Michelle McDonough6-3, 6-0
2025-06-10vs LTFC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesAmy Hand / Deoni Levy vs Michele Cunningham / Elizabeth Bendalin6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStephanie Zaitz vs Maggie Wilson6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Bracken / Michelle Sachs vs Lori Benson / Crissy Wright6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGloria Gonzalez / Heather Reimann vs Kristen Padberg / Carol Jochens6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-03vs SS-LGT GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristina Walker / Katherine Nicolson vs Natasha Vissering Hutter / Megan Abeyta6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Zaitz vs Michelle Reeb6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDusty Fitzgerald / Sarah Bracken vs Susan Jeffries / Katherine Krause6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeverly Tellis / Kara Gerczynski vs Amber McGregor / Jamie Steese2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Katherine Nicolson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.52
Deoni Levy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.43
Kara Gerczynski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.42
Dusty Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.37
Leslie Mease
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Gloria Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.37
Sarah Bracken
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.28
Heather Reimann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Michelle Sachs
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.21
Stephanie Zaitz
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.13
Amy Hand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Beverly Tellis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dusty Fitzgerald + Sarah Bracken5165% games+3.5% vs expected
Gloria Gonzalez + Sarah Bracken6064% games+0.7% vs expected
Deoni Levy + Amy Hand20560% games+0.6% vs expected
Kara Gerczynski + Beverly Tellis404 matchesnot enough data
Dusty Fitzgerald + Michelle Sachs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Nicolson
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.60
4.5
Deoni Levy
144W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Kara Gerczynski
14W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.43
Dusty Fitzgerald
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
4.42
Leslie Mease
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Gloria Gonzalez
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
Sarah Bracken
24W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Heather Reimann
61W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Michelle Sachs
52W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
Stephanie Zaitz
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Amy Hand
39W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Beverly Tellis
57W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.