Teams

Ra.Van18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-20vs Ca.Hurst18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebekah Noulles vs Mary Hartigan0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRachael Van vs Chloe Wellman0-6, 4-6
2026-07-16vs Su.Potter18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Lasater vs Christine Conti6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesSara Averitt vs Kelly Thompson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-13vs Mo.Lewis18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebekah Noulles vs Callan Fike7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesRachael Van vs Kalli Unthank4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKendall King vs Kaili Jacobson6-0, 6-1
2026-07-07vs He.Suke18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesKendall King vs Mary Hannah Andrews3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRachael Van vs Emily Wallace6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesNatalie Mayur vs Devany Ayers6-2, 6-1
2026-06-22vs De.Farmer18S2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJennifer Lasater vs Isabella Stubbs4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRebekah Noulles vs Karla Esparza3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesRachael Van vs Kristine Rosette6-1, 7-5
2026-06-15vs Sh.Bulkowski18SLost 12
W#1 SinglesNatalie Mayur vs Joli Rueter6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Rosar vs Kimberly Love0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesSara Averitt vs Lauren Mink2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-06-01vs Ca.Hurst18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesRachael Van vs Mary Hartigan3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRebekah Noulles vs Callie Hurst6-7, 4-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Rosar vs Mallory Houchin4-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs Mo.Lewis18SWon 21
L#1 SinglesKendall King vs Molly Lewis1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRebekah Noulles vs Nicole Nemmers6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesEmily Rosar vs Kaili Jacobson6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Hurst18S802314133
2Ma.Ross18S611749112
3Ma.Harber18S6116512135
4Sh.Bulkowski18S6217718174
5Je.Hastie18S5214717151
6He.Suke18S44121225192
7Ra.Van18S44101429223
8Kh.Lemon18S34111022177
9Je.Tyndall18S34101124187
10Br.Welborn18S2571428193
11De.Farmer18S2.52561530218
12Em.Butler18S2551634226
13Mo.Lewis18S2661836238
14Su.Potter18S1671429208
15Li.Singler18S1621939241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Natalie Mayur
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.43
Jennifer Lasater
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Rachael Van
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.33
Rebekah Noulles
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.31
Kendall King
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.15
Emily Rosar
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.09
Sara Averitt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Mayur
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%39%61%
2.54
Jennifer Lasater
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Rachael Van
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Rebekah Noulles
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Kendall King
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Emily Rosar
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Sara Averitt
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.