Teams

South Shore - Space Rackets

Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-27vs LLTC - Big Bang TheoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesHaley Golden / Marco A Sandoval vs Andy Chan / Aimeng Ji6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathy Ingram / Ritesh Patel vs Olivia Hu / Patrick Chou3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNina Moore / Mark Vinson vs Ethan Cho / Jenny Suh1-6, 5-7
2026-06-07vs LLTC - Love HandlesLost 02
L#1 DoublesShelby Fillingame / Ricardo Hernandez vs James Bui / Rebecca Chua4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelsey McNeil / Tyler Wedden vs Giang Dinh / Owen Plunkett6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-31vs Lifetime Baybrook - Smash N DashLost 03
L#1 DoublesBlanton Hansen / Ana Cortes vs Molly Anderson / Stephen Brown5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarco A Sandoval / Haley Golden vs Bo Li / Sophie Tahtouh1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGeber Urbina / Nina Moore vs Caleb Matlock / Kristina Graves4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-24vs HFTC - Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesHaley Golden / Marco A Sandoval vs Brendan Nelson / Kristy Kirkman6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRebecca Nguyen / Mark Vinson vs Joel Osterman / Diane White6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTyler Wedden / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Dexter Gutierrez / Aleta Cole6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs LLTC - Big Bang TheoryLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarco A Sandoval / Ana Cortes vs Lawrence Chang / Emily Warnecke2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMark Vinson / Kinsey Wedden vs Ethan Cho / Jenny Suh2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGeber Urbina / Nina Moore vs Tomas Lopes / Kristina Raphael3-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs LLTC - Love HandlesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlanton Hansen / Nina Moore vs LAN Au / Bach Nghiem5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey McNeil / Ricardo Hernandez vs Victoria Tran / Lening Wang1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKinsey Wedden / Mark Vinson vs Justin Chang / Stephanie Ho2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-26vs Lifetime Baybrook - Smash N DashLost 12
L#1 DoublesBlanton Hansen / Nina Moore vs Kim Fuke / Bo Li1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelby Fillingame / Ricardo Hernandez vs Tipton McMahon / Molly Anderson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Ingram / Mark Vinson vs Hannah Cooley / Noah Smistad1-6, 3-6
2026-04-19vs HFTC - Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGeber Urbina / Haley Golden vs George Hernandez / Linda Jacobs6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Nguyen / Ritesh Patel vs Tammy Tran / Brendan Nelson7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTyler Wedden / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Tiffany King / Joel Osterman7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Shelby Fillingame
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.20
Blanton Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Kelsey McNeil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Marco A Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Geber Urbina
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Cathy Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Rebecca Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Kinsey Wedden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Ana Cortes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Haley Golden
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Vinson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ricardo Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tyler Wedden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelby Fillingame + Tyler Wedden8555% gamesnot enough data
Marco A Sandoval + Haley Golden3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelby Fillingame
65W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
4.38
4.5
Blanton Hansen
31W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Kelsey McNeil
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.05
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Marco A Sandoval
36W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
Geber Urbina
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.70
4
Cathy Ingram
71W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Rebecca Nguyen
70W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
Kinsey Wedden
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Ana Cortes
17W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Haley Golden
42W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Mark Vinson
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Hernandez
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Wedden
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.