Teams

KY/LOU/JONES

2024 USTA FALL 55 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesTina Cline / Lisa Steen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-23vs KY/LOU/DALTON/POLTERWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargy Stivers / Lisa Steen vs Christine Montgomery / Monserrat Manrique6-4, 6-1
2024-11-16vs KY/LOU/MATTINGLY/ROBERTSLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Steen / Judette Baylon vs Kathleen Mattingly / Billie Welker0-6, 2-6
2024-11-02vs KY/LOU/VOGT/KINSLOWLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Greenrose / Lisa Steen vs Karen Hill / Cynthia Vogt3-6, 6-7
2024-10-13vs KY/LOU/MATTINGLY/ROBERTSWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Steen / Brenda Snook vs Linda Stein / Tamara Duvall-McClain6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Michelle Menting
published
Brenda Snook
published 3.5
3.23
Kim Greenrose
published
3.20
Lisa Steen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Heffley
published
2.99
Dawn Clover
published 3.5
2.98
Elizabeth Curtin
published
2.94
Tina Cline
published
2.93
Terri Saylor
published
2.86
Judette Baylon
published
2.81
Tamy Holmes
published
2.80
Margy Stivers
published
2.62
Ellen Clements
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Cline + Tamy Holmes134 matchesnot enough data
Terri Saylor + Elizabeth Curtin123 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Clements + Tamy Holmes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Menting
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Brenda Snook
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Greenrose
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Lisa Steen
173W–163L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Lisa Heffley
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dawn Clover
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Elizabeth Curtin
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Tina Cline
25W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
Terri Saylor
2W–19L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93
Judette Baylon
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Tamy Holmes
16W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
Margy Stivers
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
Ellen Clements
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.