Teams

The Confidence Builders

2024 Ekolu 18 and Over League · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-24vs Dragon BallzLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesAlpana Khairom / Kumiko Kida vs Gayle Hatakeyama / Yuko Omorai1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-17vs Tropic ThunderWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAlpana Khairom / Kumiko Kida vs Eko Hasegawa / Shana Suzuki3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-10vs Spin to WinWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesLovely Lacbay / Kent Tanizawa vs Jerry Barton / Shoko Burkett6-4, 7-5
2024-08-03vs ImuaLost 01
L#1 Mixed DoublesNathaniel Weeks / Lovely Lacbay vs Fung Eng / Anna Lee6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-28vs Dumb ShotsLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesAlpana Khairom / Kumiko Kida vs Erin Sandon / Kayla Kikiloi6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 Mixed DoublesNathaniel Weeks / Lovely Lacbay vs Derek Yamane / Sara Gruvin1-6, 3-6
2024-07-13vs Aloha LOLWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLovely Lacbay / Alpana Khairom vs Cheryl Hay / Pamela Jinnohara6-1, 6-0
2024-07-06vs Three Little BirdsWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAlpana Khairom / Kumiko Kida vs Margaux Leonardo / Dayna Luka6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Alpana Khairom
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Kent Tanizawa
published 3.5
3.00
Lovely Lacbay
usually #1 Mixed Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
David Yuen
published 3
2.94
Kaori Ogawa
published
2.88
Kumiko Kida
published
2.84
Gem Lacbay
published 3
2.46
Brandon Bryan
published
Caleb Carnine
published
Mahina Knuckles
published
Nathaniel Weeks
published
Trai Matthew Klag
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaori Ogawa + Kumiko Kida213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alpana Khairom
60W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Kent Tanizawa
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Lovely Lacbay
23W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
David Yuen
7W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kaori Ogawa
21W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.94
Kumiko Kida
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Gem Lacbay
8W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Christopher Stevens
3W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
Brandon Bryan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Caleb Carnine
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mahina Knuckles
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nathaniel Weeks
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Trai Matthew Klag
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.