Teams

Walley-2.5-PB

2026 Team Singles Tournament-PB · 2.5 W

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-01vs Whittle-2.5-NELost 02
L#1 SinglesHaley Walley vs Reika Sato0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Sumrall vs Joy Whittle1-6, 1-6
2026-03-01vs Gartman-2.5-GCLost 12
W#1 SinglesSarah Sumrall vs Kelly Robinson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHolly Alexander vs Jennifer Mitchell1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesHaden Walters vs Robyn Johnson0-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs DiSanti-2.5-GCLost 12
L#1 SinglesIvey Holder vs Katy Boyer2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesBayley Alexander vs Tracy Jackson-Wilson1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesHaley Walley vs Tracey Mathews6-0, 6-1
2026-02-28vs Bayati-2.5W-JXNLost 03
L#1 SinglesHolly Alexander vs Stephanie Bailey2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesIvey Holder vs Alexandria Sylvester1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesBayley Alexander vs Olivia Barnard2-6, 4-6
2026-02-28vs Thurman-2.5W-SWLost 03
L#1 SinglesSarah Sumrall vs Adrienne Douglas1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesHaden Walters vs Darby Freeman5-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHaley Walley vs Kayla Thurman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.47
Sarah Sumrall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.29
Haley Walley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.28
Bayley Alexander
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.18
Ivey Holder
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.18
Holly Alexander
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Haden Walters
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Haley Walley + Haden Walters9359% games+11.2% vs expected
Bayley Alexander + Ivey Holder2346% games+6.3% vs expected
Holly Alexander + Bayley Alexander2437% gamesnot enough data
Haley Walley + Bayley Alexander044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Sumrall
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Haley Walley
22W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Bayley Alexander
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Ivey Holder
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Holly Alexander
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Haden Walters
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.