Teams

4*JMontague-Eno

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd

11 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-29vs 5*MLong-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Jeff Reedy vs Michael Ratliff / Francisco Burbano6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Will Johnson vs Richard Millard / Joonho Oh6-0, 6-0
2024-07-27vs 6*AYoung-EVLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Schumann / Arash Chehrazi vs Taylor Soddy / Tevin Wilson3-6, 4-6
2024-07-13vs 2*KMoyung-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Reedy / Eric Lindblom vs Dipen Vyas / Chris Mansfield6-4, 6-4
2024-06-29vs 8*PHariharan-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesConor Kregecz / Will Johnson vs John Nealis / Olimani Deivasigamani1-6, 4-6
2024-06-22vs 2*CMoffitt-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Christopher Lott vs Justin Frye / Mark Petersen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWill Johnson / Arash Chehrazi vs Tanner Dellinger / Jay Krueger5-7, 4-6
2024-06-15Won 20
W#1 DoublesEric Lindblom / Jeff Reedy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesArash Chehrazi / David Schumann vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-01vs 2*KMoyung-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Lott / Eric Lindblom vs Jack Hu / Sanjay Ambardar6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Christopher Lott
published 4
3.86
Eric Lindblom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Schumann
published 4
3.71
Jeff Reedy
published 4
3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
published
3.33
Arash Chehrazi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Christopher Rogge
published 3.5
2.88
Robert Long
published
2.76
Travis Angle
published
Brent Fox
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Lott
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Eric Lindblom
121W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jeff Reedy
62W–66L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.60
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Arash Chehrazi
87W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Christopher Rogge
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Robert Long
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Travis Angle
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.