Teams

THPRD-Barrantes

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Sac Roth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Prashanth Sakthi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
Paul Kreiter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
James Trolio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Anurag Jain
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Michael Barrantes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.29
Konstantin Arturov
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Francisco Pereira de Almeida Tulha
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Amir Hanania
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sac Roth
15W–12L career
0%86%14%
3.46
3.5
Prashanth Sakthi
15W–21L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Paul Kreiter
59W–25L career
0%96%4%
3.38
3.5
James Trolio
34W–12L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Anurag Jain
25W–19L career
0%97%2%
3.32
3.5
Michael Barrantes
73W–33L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Konstantin Arturov
29W–14L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
45W–45L career
2%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Francisco Pereira de Almeida Tulha
27W–15L career
4%96%1%
3.22
3.5
Amir Hanania
38W–20L career
15%85%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.