Teams

Long/Knoxville

2025 Adult 70 & Over Invitational-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Long/Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sandra Smith
published
3.34
Karen Benedict
published
3.25
Debbie Ashton
published 3.5
Ann Ham
published 3.5
3.19
Janice Whitehead
published
3.17
Carolyn Hutsell
published 3.5
3.17
Sandra Long
published
3.10
Donna Worrell
published 3.5
2.97
Lila Downs
published
2.96
Carol Irick
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Whitehead + Karen Benedict5354% games+4.0% vs expected
Carol Irick + Donna Worrell71144% games−3.5% vs expected
Debbie Ashton + Sandra Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Janice Whitehead + Lila Downs213 matchesnot enough data
Janice Whitehead + Donna Worrell123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Smith
24W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
Karen Benedict
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Debbie Ashton
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ann Ham
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janice Whitehead
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Carolyn Hutsell
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Sandra Long
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Donna Worrell
21W–27L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lila Downs
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3.5
Carol Irick
20W–20L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.