Teams

Elysium 3

2023 FALL A18&O Daytime Women · FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-01-13vs Racquet Club 1Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Abbruzzese / Corinne Rogers vs Cathy Bassani / Carol Sweeney1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-18vs Elysium 4Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Abbruzzese / Emily Iddings vs Tracy Hayes / Stephanie Valentine1-6, 2-6
2022-10-21vs Wickertree 1Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Thielbar / Carolyn Abbruzzese vs Cathy Etheridge / Amy DeRose5-7, 4-1, 1-0
2022-10-14vs Scarborough 2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Houser / Tiffanie Roberts vs Cheryl Carey / Cindy Berend6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-10-07vs Players Club 2Won 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Smith / Tiffanie Roberts vs Laura Ubert / Katharine Reda7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-09-30vs Players Club 1Lost 01
L#2 SinglesTiffanie Roberts vs Heidi Miller5-7, 5-7
2022-09-09vs Wickertree 2Lost 02
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Abbruzzese vs Lisa Bailey2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTiffanie Roberts / Catherine Bournstein vs Daphne Suh / Heather Sankovich3-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 2.5W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Susan Grunert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
Beth Wicker
published 3
2.63
Heidi Jensen
published 3
2.63
Misty Workman
published
2.50
Stephani Kim
published
2.31
Tara Talgar
published
2.18
Carolyn Abbruzzese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Mary O'Connell
published
Soley Somma
published
Tiffanie Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Jensen + Misty Workman16954% games+1.4% vs expected
Tiffanie Roberts + Heidi Jensen224 matchesnot enough data
Misty Workman + Mary O'Connell044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Wicker + Susan Grunert404 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Jensen + Tara Talgar213 matchesnot enough data
Soley Somma + Susan Grunert303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Grunert
150W–64L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Beth Wicker
17W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Heidi Jensen
75W–81L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Misty Workman
39W–63L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Stephani Kim
16W–33L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
Tara Talgar
47W–44L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Carolyn Abbruzzese
17W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Mary O'Connell
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Soley Somma
18W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffanie Roberts
57W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.