Teams

Burkwood - Kovarcik

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Davis / Charlie Chien Le vs David King / Brian Cox5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-01vs Avalon GraingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs Kristopher Johnson / Jon Czyszczon6-4, 7-6
2025-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Davis / David Ames vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesMike Davis / Ken Lu vs Subramaniam Arjunan / KANNAN VIVEKANANDAN3-6, 3-6
2025-04-27vs Ridgetop-GivenWon 10
W#2 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs John Crawford / William Carnahan6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Woodlake BrukaszWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Barth / Mike Davis vs Eric Neal / James Costello6-2, 6-1
2025-04-12vs MTC Stephens 3.5 WKENDLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Davis / Joseph Golden vs Alex Balas / Jon Slaven5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-04-06vs 3.5 WO Boyle/SibleyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Kovarcik / Mike Davis vs Scott Boyle / Philip Strunk1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Abel Guzman
published 4
3.43
Andrew Barth
published 3.5
3.42
Jonathan Kovarcik
published
3.26
Mike Davis
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Carter
published
3.17
Steven Walworth
published
3.13
David Ames
published 3.5
3.01
Travis Prowant
published
2.92
Charlie Chien Le
published 3.5
Joseph Golden
published
Ken Lu
published
Travis Preau
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Abel Guzman
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Andrew Barth
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jonathan Kovarcik
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Mike Davis
95W–71L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Kevin Carter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Steven Walworth
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
David Ames
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Travis Prowant
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Charlie Chien Le
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
Joseph Golden
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Lu
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Preau
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.