Teams

ACAC Preusser

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-14vs Avalon LuchsingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiane Reale / Catherine Long vs Kelly Schuler / Martha Luchsinger2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Diersen / Ann Mann vs Liz Wiebe / Ann Flippin2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Lemon / Kelli Maher vs Nancy Bryner / Morgan Pilkington6-7, 2-6
2025-09-06vs Willow Oaks Ha 5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Mann / Ashley Diersen vs Kristin Hamlin / Ann Kuhn2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMary Follis / Mary Carlson vs Asha Kays / Alison Rogish3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Long / Elizabeth Clark vs Catherine Smith / Catherine Hunt6-3, 6-6
2025-08-23vs SCC 5.5 Volley Llamas - ShafferLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Worrel / Catherine Long vs Carla Shaffer / Aimee Collins4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Reale / Julia Preusser vs Cathy Keith / Leslie Percy6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBeverly Davis / Anna Holloway vs BRANDY NICKEL / Jessica Moore1-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJackie Granger / Lisa Greenberg vs Carolyn Hawley / Joanne Rosel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Mann / Ashley Diersen vs Clarissa McDonough / Tatenda Mupfudze7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Foley / Kimberlee Pepple vs Meghan Gemmill / Barbara Wood6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-09vs WW Deiorio 5.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Worrel / Kelli Maher vs Ryan Kirtner / Amanda Stamper0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMary Follis / Mary Carlson vs Deborah Mancini / Nicole Deiorio6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Lemon / Susann Young vs Kelly Thoerig / Susan Bond1-6, 1-6
2025-08-08vs KRA Klutch Ballers - HillLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Reale / Susann Young vs Heather DeBolt / Virginia Kaufmann6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatricia Foley / Kelli Maher vs Cheryl Ware / Stacey Hill6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Worrel / Julia Preusser vs Lauren Noonkester / Laura Sumner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-03vs Burkwood 5.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesJulia Preusser / Diane Reale vs Holly Barth / Jennifer Love6-4, 6-7
W#2 DoublesBeverly Davis / Mary Carlson vs Libby Brown / Bobbie Sue Tunstall6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Ann Mann
published 3
2.79
Mary Follis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Ashley Diersen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.66
Jackie Granger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Diane Reale
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Kelli Maher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Beverly Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Kimberlee Pepple
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Catherine Long
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Anna Holloway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Julia Preusser
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Mary Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Susann Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Lemon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Worrel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Granger + Mary Follis5059% games+5.8% vs expected
Mary Follis + Mary Carlson2345% games−1.1% vs expected
Julia Preusser + Catherine Long1443% games−2.9% vs expected
Mary Follis + Ashley Diersen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Mann
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Mary Follis
28W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Ashley Diersen
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Diane Reale
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.62
Kelli Maher
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Beverly Davis
4W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
Kimberlee Pepple
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.50
3
Catherine Long
11W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Anna Holloway
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.38
Julia Preusser
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.37
Mary Carlson
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
Susann Young
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Kristin Lemon
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Worrel
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.